Archive for the ‘China’ Category

China-DPRK open trade zone

Thursday, August 10th, 2006

From NK Zone:

Few details are available, but the zone will be in the Namyang Workers’ Zone in Unseong county, Hamgyeong Bukdo province in the extreme north of North Korea, opposite the Chinese city of Tumen

The report notes that there are roads and railways crossing the border and the area is a transit point for Chinese, Korean and Japanese goods and that citizens of third countries have access.

The agreement was signed at the Chinese embassy in Pyongyang between the head of the foreign affairs department of Hamgyeong Bukdo, Kim Cheol-geun, and the Chinese consul-general, Sun Xianyu

The report does not say if the agreement has NK central government approval, which is apparently a sticking point in the much bigger deal under which the Chinese city of Hunchun will lease the NK port of Rajin.

Share

Lankov on DPRK/ROK/PRC relations

Tuesday, August 8th, 2006

From the Korea Times:

Elusive Welcome Mat
By Andrei Lankov
 
It is believed that some 40,000 to 80,000 North Koreans live in Northeast China, earning money through unskilled work, or living with their Chinese partners. Some five years ago, their number was much greater _ perhaps, up to 250,000.

At first sight, defection to South Korea would be the most logical next step for these people. After all, the South Korean Constitution does not recognize the existence of North Korean state, thus every North Korean is, by definition, a citizen of the Republic of Korea (ROK), eligible to special rights and protection. However, such defections are rare _ only a few thousand North Koreans have move to the South over the last few years. Why?

The major reason is the unwillingness of the South Korean government to help refugees gain safe conduct to Korea. When a refugee manages to contact the South Korean embassy or consulate in China, he or she does not find support there. Those who have relatives in the South can use the expensive services of people smugglers (at least, $5,000 up front), but the majority have no chance to get to the South without some official support _ and this support is not forthcoming.

Among those who have been denied assistance there have even been some who would have been seen as god-given propaganda gifts 10 or 15 years ago. In 1996, for example, the South Korean Embassy in Beijing was visited by a family of six whose father, an exemplary “shock worker,’’ was once granted a rare honour _ to have his picture taken with Kim Il-sung himself. The diplomats advised the family that they were unable to do anything for them and wished the would-be defectors good luck. But they had no such luck _ they were arrested, deported back to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, and severely punished. A 36-year-old military officer from an elite security unit fled to China in 1996. He spent 1996-2002 repeatedly applying for permission to move to the South. He contacted the South Korean Embassy a number of times but every time the diplomats advised him “be patient and wait.’’

A defector once told a South Korean journalist: “When I first fled the North I thought that it would be easy to go to South Korea. With the help of ethnic Koreans I arrived in Qingdao [China] in August 1996. But at the Korean Consulate, on which I had pinned all my hopes, [I] was told: ‘Under the present circumstances, this is difficult.’ [I felt like] the heavens collapsed.’’

Only those who represent an exceptional propaganda value (or have had access to very important intelligence) can count on official assistance these days.

Are you going to have an outburst of righteous disgust about “heartless Seoul bureaucrats?’’ Alas, it is not that easy. There are good reasons why the South Korean officials act in such a way…

First of all, the ROK does not wish to create problems with China, which carefully maintains its neutrality in the Korean conflict and does not wish to become a transition zone for crowds of refugees heading for Seoul. South Korean officials are also wary of ethnic Koreans from China who might try to pass themselves off as North Koreans to get access to ROK citizenship.

Admittedly, those refugees who manage to cross the border again, and reach the South Korean missions in South East Asia might count on better treatment and help. But the way across China is expensive and dangerous, especially since the Chinese police are on the lookout for likely refugees from North Korea.

Nevertheless, it appears that the major reason behind Seoul’s passivity is not a set of diplomatic calculations but a tacit understanding that refugees _ largely uneducated peasants _ have little hope of adjusting to South Korean society. Indeed, the defectors seldom fare well in the South _ in spite of the generous if recently curtailed aid packages. Encouraging defection would entail a great increase in spending on the already large aid programs.

In addition, Seoul does not want to destabilize its ex-enemy. A large-scale exodus of North Koreans to the South would likely cause a serious political crisis in Pyongyang. This is exactly the scenario that South Korean diplomacy strives to prevent: in recent years the notion of “German-type unification’’ is seen as a nightmare, to be avoided at all costs. Economic considerations play a major role, but one should not forget the remote but real chance that a cornered Pyongyang would start a new Korean War as a last resort.

Are these considerations sufficient enough to justify inaction? Frankly, I do not know. Alas, in real life people often have to make difficult choices between two evils, and attempts to present such choices in black-and-white are likely to lead to more tragedies. Seoul’s policy toward the North in the recent decade has been a basket of choices between bad and worse _ even though politicians were wise enough not to call a spade a spade, guarding the feelings of the majority who prefer to comfortably see the world in black and white. But that is another story…

Share

DPRK inflation on the increase

Tuesday, August 1st, 2006

from the Daily NK:

Recently, concerns mounted that a counterfeit $100 “supernote” was being used as “official currency” between North Korean traders.

For a while, the supernote was used in areas of China in common trade and drug smuggling. The counterfeit money began circulating in Jangmadang and then North Korean markets, as “unofficial forms of trade”.

As of early this year, the supernote circulated amongst North Korean common traders was valued at $70, and by June, had spread throughout the whole nation. It appears that the counterfeit money is being accepted as “income currency”.

This information was obtained by North Korean and Chinese tradesmen residing both in and outside of North Korea.

On July 26th, Park Chul Woong (pseudonym, 34), a Korean-Chinese merchant in Dandong, China said “It has been a while since counterfeit money has been used as a form of transaction in North Korea. Now, tradesmen use the supernote amongst themselves to do business”.

Park said “Even if you make a small deal of $1,000, this still equates to 600 sheets of North Korean 5,000 won notes. (The largest North Korean bill) As people do not want to carry this amount of money with them, merchants use the counterfeit money instead”.

Also, Park said “Merchants do not deal with North Korean currency as they do not trust it. When inflation rises rapidly as in 2002, merchants sit around and discuss how the money has no value. However, there is nothing you cannot do with the dollar. As the dollar is scarce, merchants have resorted to using fakes.”

The traders complain that the North Korean currency has lost its value so much, that if they were to use the money for trade at markets they would have to carry numerous bags of it. They also said “Every day the market price fluctuates dramatically. The more you trade with North Korean money, the greater the loss.”

No control of counterfeit money
 
Last May, Kim Young Man (pseudonym, 38), a Korean-Chinese who went to Shinuiju for an Investment Conference, said “North Korea is unhestitantly using the counterfeit $100 note as real $70. It is of concern as to how far they will take this.”

He said “Even business employees of the National Security Office or the Department of the People’s Armed Forces General Logistics Bureau use counterfeit when paying Chinese tradesman for products such as seafood and hand-made goods. If North Korean authorities discover that counterfeit money is circulating in North Korea on such a large scale, chaos could ensue.”

Also, he said “Merchants generally carry dollars. Rich merchants store their real currency in safekeeping and use counterfeit money for “exchange”. He continued, “Although the whole world has eradicated counterfeit money, North Korea is still far behind”.

At Dandong’s economic development zone, a Chinese tradesman said “The U.S. alleges that it will eradicate the counterfeit money, but there has been little change. The value of the counterfeit money at $70 is not depreciating”.

On the one hand, tradesmen say “Apart from the supernotes manufactured by North Korean authorities, computer-made supernotes have been discovered and rejected as a means of business.”

At present, it is difficult to estimate how much counterfeit money is circulating around North Korea. However, if the counterfeit money is accepted amongst common traders at Jangmadang, this means that the counterfeit currency has reached a large scale and is spreading further.

This substantiates the failure of the North Korean authority’s implementation of foreign transaction of the Euro in December, 2002.

Last July, at the Interpol Conference on counterfeit money in Riom, France, North Korea was marked as “a hotbed of counterfeit money”. It is expected that the U.S. will take drastic measures to control the counterfeit dollars circulating throughout North Korea as official currency.

Share

Isolated North Korea pulling back even more

Tuesday, August 1st, 2006

Joong Ang Daily
August 01, 2006

With North Korea more isolated than ever from the international community over its nuclear program and recent missile launches, Pyongyang is taking steps to tighten controls on its people in a bid to show it can defy the international community, North Koreans interviewed in Beijing said.

“It seems that we have to sing the revolutionary songs again,” said one North Korean in Beijing, saying it was time for his country to get mentally tougher. “Nobody listens to us, thus the only way left is to stick together,” the North Korean said.

If Pyongyang hoped to gain more concessions in nuclear negotiations and resolve the issue of financial sanctions imposed by Washington on Banco Delta Asia through its missile launch, the results have been the opposite.

A United Nations Security Council resolution backed by Pyongyang’s long-time ally, Beijing, was adopted. The Bank of China also froze North Korean accounts at its Macao branch, a Korean lawmaker has said.

In addition, a senior official of the United States Treasury Department said recently, Singapore and Vietnam have made commitments to clamp down on illicit North Korean financial activities such as money laundering.

A source in Seoul who is familiar with North Korea’s circumstances said yesterday that Pyongyang has decided to halt exchanges with the outside until April of next year. The Arirang Festival scheduled for this month has already been cancelled.

Experts said a series of economic measures aimed at reviving the North’s ailing economy, which have been underway since 2001, will also likely be put on hold.

“Inside the North, there are even some calling for a halt of the Kaesong Industrial Complex and the Mount Kumgang tours,” said the source, who added that large numbers of North Korean college students are submitting requests to enlist in the military.

Recently, a senior North Korean official on a visit to Beijing said the North is fully prepared to engage in “a march of suffering.” Recent rhetoric coming out of Pyongyang reflects a war-like atmosphere in the country. The state-run Rodong Sinmun has warned that “invaders would be swept away by the fierce anger of the country.”

A government official in Seoul yesterday admitted that in the short run, diplomatic efforts to lure Pyongyang back to nuclear negotiations would be tough. “We are in a difficult situation, but what else can we do but try?” said the official.

Share

North Korean energy trade with China

Tuesday, August 1st, 2006

Nautilus Institute
Nathaniel Aden
August 2006

Paper here: Nautilus-Aden.pdf
web link here

Abstract:  China is North Korea’s largest international trading partner. Since 1995, energy and fuels have dominated bilateral trade between allies.  North Korea is a net importer of Chinese crude oil and oil products; however, it became a net exporter of electricity and coal to China in 2003.  Whereas North Korean coal and electricity exports are sold at sub-market “friendship prices,” Chinese coal and oil products have been sold to North Korea at premium prices.  Over the past ten years, North Korea’s imports have become increasingly energy-intensive, while exports have become more labor-intensive.  Chinese customs data suggest that Beijing is taking a pragmatic, market-oriented approach to trade with its reclusive neighbor, while the increasingly asymmetrical energy embodiment of bilateral trade may reflect dilapidation of North Korea’s non-military industries.

Bullet Points:
1.  In 2005, bilateral trade with the PRC accounted for 39% of North Korean international trade by value.

2. North Korean trade data are compiled by partner-country Customs Bureaus, the United Nations, and the Internaitonal Monetary fund (IMF).  China and South Korea provide the best “mirror” statistics.  Customs data do not include aid shipments, official development assistance, direct government transfers, foreign direct investment, services, remittances, barter trade, smuggling, illicit trade, trade in military equipment.

3.  The DPRK has spent an increasing amount of money on diminishing quantities of energy imports, particularly Chinese crude.  The decline of energy import volumes in the face of increasing overall imports and trade may reflect demand sensitivity to increased international market prices and/or North Korea’s lack of hard currency with which to purchase imported energy and fuels.

4. The DPRK has significant, ongoing refining capabilities.

5. Between 1985 and 2002, the DPRK domestic coal production has declined from 37.5 million tons to 21.9 million tons.  Nonetheless, North Korea increased its export quantity to 2% of total domestic production since 2002. 

6.  Starting in May 2005, North Korea has been an uninterrupted monthly electricity exporter.  Hydropower may account for much of the DPRKs surplus electric power.

7.  Energy prices reflect the pragmatic, market-oriented character of China’s economic relationship with North Korea.  North Korea may be providing China coal at subsidized prices, below those of China’s other trading partners.

8.  North Korea coal export prices show an awareness of market prices starting in 2002.

9.  The DPRK has consistently paid premium prices for Chinese oil product exports over the last ten years.

10. Aside from politically-determined prices, several conditions could explain this: 1.  Real factors (transport costs, demand, goegraphy) 2. Pyongyang’s insulation from market realities 3.  No DPRK leverage.

11. In 2005, North Korea imported $2omillion worht of trucks, $2 million worth of cars, $1 million of tractors.  The transport sector has not grown significantly since 1995.

12.  Shift of DPRK trade towards energy-intensive imports and labor-intensive exports suggests deterioration of non-military industry.

Share

China Seeks U.N. Title to Mt. Baekdu

Monday, July 31st, 2006

From the Donga:

The Chinese Government is hurriedly working on making the world recognize Mt. Baekdu (or Mt. Changbai in Chinese) as Chinese territory.

The Wenhui Newspaper of Hong Kong reported on July 30 that China has decided to register Mt. Baekdu on the World Geopark list designated by the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

The Jilin Provincial Government of China has so far made efforts to get Mt. Baekdu registered as a world natural heritage site by the year 2008 when Jilin hosts the general assembly of the UNESCO World Heritage Committee. It might be fair to call this the “Mt. Baekdu Project” of incorporating the old territory of Goguryeo, an ancient Korean kingdom, into Chinese history, as it follows the Northeast Asia Project that focused on incorporating its history into China’s.

Back in 1980, China got Mt. Baekdu designated as a UNESCO Man and Biosphere (MAB) zone; the State Council designated Mt. Baekdu as a national-level natural protection zone in 1986 and has since managed it.

Mt. Baekdu has long been managed by the Yanbian Korean Autonomous Prefecture, where people of Korean origin collectively reside. Last year, the Jilin Provincial Government established the “Committee for Protection, Development and Management of Mt. Changbai,” an organization directly belonging to the provincial government and responsible for management of the mountain.

In a meeting with the “First Delegation of Chinese Internet Journalists Visiting Jilin” on July 22, Vice Director Li Zhanwun of the Committee said, “Mt. Changbai ranked second out of 17 places on the preliminary list of the nation’s cultural and natural heritage that the National Construction Ministry announced for the first time in January. Protection and development of the areas near Mt. Changbai has entered a new phase of development.”

The Committee plans to inject two billion Yuan (approximately 240 billion won) to develop the western slope of Mt. Baekdu on the Chinese side and open it around the year starting 2007.

Mt. Changbai Airport, which is currently being constructed in Fusong County 36 kilometers away from the North Korean border, is scheduled to open before the 2008 Beijing Olympics begins. The Jilin Provincial Government is also sparing no investment to expand the transportation networks near Mt. Baekdu, and is planning to complete construction of the Mt. Changbai Eastern Railroad, three highway networks and circular roadways in the next three years.

The Chinese National Tourism Agency and the Jilin Provincial Government recently held the first tourism festival near Mt. Baekdu; they are also active in attracting tourists from Russia and other foreign countries by holding the Yanbian Korean ethnic exposition. They also seek to stimulate the economy by developing mineral water in the areas nearby Mt. Baekdu and expanding cultivation of ginseng there.

Meanwhile, the Chinese government is reportedly seeking to register as UNESCO world cultural heritage the remnants of the Sanggyeong Yongcheonbu, which is the old capital of another ancient Korean kingdom—Balhae—located in the Bohai Bay, Ningan City, Heilongjiang Province.

Share

U.S. hails Bank of China’s freeze

Friday, July 28th, 2006

Joong Ang Daily
July 28, 2006

North’s accounts were in Macau branch, Korean legislator says 

The United States is encouraged by Beijing’s “affirmative steps” in freezing North Korean accounts at a Chinese bank, White House Spokesman Tony Snow said on Wednesday.

His remarks were the first official confirmation of a South Korean lawmaker’s earlier claim that the Bank of China had frozen North Korean assets. Beijing remained silent on the issue after Grand National Party lawmaker Park Jin revealed the news, citing an unidentified former White House official as his source, after a trip to Washington.

Mr. Park said yesterday that the frozen accounts he was referring to were only in the Bank of China’s Macau branch, but that he is looking into whether the Beijing branch will make a similar move.

Mr. Snow was asked if Washington had knowledge of China’s actions in regard to freezing accounts. He answered yes, and said the move was related to counterfeiting issues.

In a related development, Stuart Levey, the undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence of the U.S. Treasury department warned yesterday in an interview with Yonhap News Agency that North Korea could use funds legally gained through trade for military purposes. A diplomatic source in Washington said yesterday the remarks by Mr. Levey could mean Washington might pressure Seoul about the Kaesong Industrial Complex and the Mount Kumgang tours, through which Pyongyang receives cash from the South.

A government official in Seoul said yesterday that if Washington tries to alter the current course of inter-Korean projects it would meet “heavy resistance” from Seoul.

Unification Minister Lee Jong-seok has repeatedly said the inter-Korean projects would not be influenced by North Korea’s recent missile salvo.

In October last year, the U.S. Treasury department designated eight North Korean entities as being involved in the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Under U.S. law, all transactions between the designated entities and any person in the United States are prohibited while all assets of these entities are frozen in territories under U.S. jurisdiction. 

Share

DPRK, China agree on border river management

Tuesday, July 25th, 2006

From Xinhua via NKZone:

China and North Korea have signed an agreement to facilitate transportation through and environmental protection of a border river.

According to the agreement inked last Friday in Changchun, capital of northern China’s Jilin Province which neighbors North Korea, the two sides will cooperate on the management of navigation buoys and the dredging of part of the Yalu River.

During a nine-day meeting, traffic officials from both sides also discussed measures to prevent environmental damage caused by the dredging works.

The two sides also agreed to tighten management of cargo ships plying the river, according to sources who attended the meeting.

Share

China freezes DPRK bank accounts I

Monday, July 24th, 2006

This is big news.  The Bank of China has frozen DPRK-owned bank accoounts for one of two reasons:

1.  The Bank of China plans to list on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), as a result, it has to comply with western regulations and concerns…making its role as the new faciltator of DPRK monetary transactions more difficult to accept.  

2.  The Chinese now suspect the DPRK of counterfeiting the Chinese Yuan.

I am not sure of the real reason just yet.  Anyway, here is the coverage in the South Korean press: 

From the Joong Ang Daily:

Bank of China freezes North’s money accounts
Lawmaker, citing U.S. official, blames counterfeiting concerns
by Brian Lee 

The state-run Bank of China has frozen its North Korean bank accounts due to concerns over counterfeit money, a Grand National Party lawmaker claimed yesterday.

Lawmaker Park Jin said his information came from a former senior U.S. government official of the Bush administration, who served at the White House.

Nevertheless, an official with the Foreign Ministry said yesterday that there was no information in regard to Mr. Park’s claim while the Chinese Embassy to Seoul said it was not in a position to comment.

Mr. Park visited in Washington recently with ruling and opposition lawmakers.

The lawmaker said that after Washington initiated an operation called “Smoking Dragon” in September of last year, which was designed to target North Korean counterfeit activities, a Macao-based bank was put under financial sanctions and North Korea moved its bank accounts to China in response.

Mr. Park said the former official told him that continuing probes by Washington led to the measure taken by the Chinese bank.

Mr. Park said yesterday that the Chinese bank was opting to list its stock at the New York Stock Exchange and was told it had little choice but to freeze the accounts.

The lawmaker said he didn’t know the exact timing of when the Chinese bank had frozen the North Korean accounts but speculated that a recent rift between Beijing and Pyongyang was due in part to that incident.

China agreed to a UN resolution passed earlier this month that was drafted in response to North Korea’s missile launch, which occurred despite Beijing’s efforts to stop it.

Mr. Park asserted that Pyongyang is also forging Chinese yuan currency. However, Unification Minister Lee Jong-seok who was asked about it yesterday at a briefing to the National Assembly’s Unification, Foreign Affairs and Trade Committee, said Seoul had no information one way or the other about the forging.

From the Korea Times:

China freezes N.K. accounts: lawmaker
By Lee Joo-hee

A South Korean lawmaker yesterday claimed that the Bank of China froze its North Korean accounts in relation to the alleged counterfeiting activities of the communist regime.

Citing former and incumbent Washington officials, Grand National Party lawmaker Park Jin said the latest move by China was connected with the United States’ financial measures against North Korea’s counterfeiting and laundering of money.

“This is a virtual ban against dealing with North Korea by China, leaving North Korea all the more devastated,” Park said. Park was in Washington to attend a seminar that started on July 15.

Last September, the U.S. Treasury Department cautioned American banks from dealing with Banco-Delta Asia, a Macau-based bank, which allegedly helped circulate North Korea’s counterfeit U.S. dollars.

The measure eventually forced the Macau bank to freeze the North Korean accounts, which amounted to $24 million.

North Korea immediately protested the move and has since boycotted the six-party talks.

“According to U.S. officials, although the $24 million may not appear to be a large sum, North Korea is sensitive to this issue because most of the funds are used for bribery and purchases of weapon components,” Park said.

Park said that following the freeze of BDA, the U.S. Treasury Department trained their radars onto other banks in Macau. North Korea has moved its accounts into banks in China since, he said.

Washington is currently evaluating the data from BDA for proof that North Korea counterfeited U.S. dollars.

North Korea is apparently concerned that the BDA measure could also affect some $200 million to $300 million accounts that are scattered in Singapore, Austria, Switzerland and Russia.

In yesterday’s parliamentary session, Park questioned Unification Minister Lee Jong-seok over North Korea’s counterfeit currency.

Park contended that North Korea was also counterfeiting Chinese yuan, but Lee responded that he did not have any specific information about it.

Reports in Tokyo yesterday said Japan was contemplating revising foreign exchange and trade laws, as part of its additional sanctions on North Korea over its missile launches.

The revisions are likely to require about 300 Japanese-based companies with business ties with North Korea to suspend exports of about 40 materials to destinations that are believed to be linked to the North’s missile program, the Yomiuiri newspaper reported.

It will require the companies to report to the Trade Ministry the details of their exports of targeted materials, including large trucks, titanium alloys and carbon fiber, the Yomiuri said.

Japan is also considering banning cash remittances and freezing North Korean assets in the country.

From Yonhap:

Chinese bank said to freeze N.K. accounts for currency counterfeiting

North Korea is suspected of having printed fake Chinese currency, which prompted the Bank of China (BOC) to freeze all of its North Korean accounts in an apparent retaliation, a South Korean legislator asserted on Monday.

Quoting a number of unidentified U.S. officials, Rep. Park Jin of the main opposition Grand National Party (GNP) said the freezing of North Korean accounts at the BOC is tantamount to virtual imposition of sanctions by Beijing on the North.

“I understand the North is even more frustrated because this means China is in fact imposing sanctions on North Korea,” the opposition lawmaker told Yonhap News Agency in a telephone interview.

Park has just returned to the country after a three-day trip to Washington along with 12 other ruling and opposition party legislators.

The GNP lawmaker claimed Washington may have been aware of the Chinese bank’s move as early as late last year when its Treasury Department imposed sanctions on a Macau bank suspected of circulating counterfeit U.S. dollars printed in the North.

“I suspect (the United States) did not announce the part related to China considering the sensitivity of the issue,” Park said.

He later claimed Beijing may be working with Washington to crack down on Pyongyang’s alleged counterfeiting of Chinese yuan.

“Following U.S. dollars, North Korea is also counterfeiting China’s currency, the yuan,” Park said during a meeting of the National Assembly Unification, Foreign Affairs and Trade Committee.

The claim, if found true, is expected to further complicate the stalled negotiations over North Korea’s nuclear weapons program as the United States has been looking to China to convince the North to return to the multilateral talks.

Pyongyang has been staying away from the talks since November, shortly after Washington imposed sanctions on the Macau bank, Banco Delta Asia.

Share

China #1 food donor to DPRK, #3 in world

Friday, July 21st, 2006

From the Financial Times:

China’s food aid to North Korea soars
By Mure Dickie in Beijing
July 21 2006

China’s soaring cereal shipments to politically isolated North Korea made it the world’s third largest food donor last year, according to the United Nations World Food Programme.

The scale of China’s supplies of wheat, flour and coarse grains highlights the sensitive issue of Beijing’s support for a Pyongyang regime whose recent missile test launches have drawn international opprobrium.

It is likely to spur calls from the US and elsewhere for China to do more to push North Korea to rejoin international talks aimed at ending its nuclear weapons programme.

Pyongyang received more than 90 per cent of the 576,582 tons of cross-border food aid provided by China in 2005, according to data from the WFP’s International Food Aid Information System.

The shipments meant China’s total food donations climbed 260 per cent year-on-year and were surpassed only by those of the US and EU.

Beijing has long been North Korea’s most important supplier of fuel and food, but the World Food Progamme figures suggested a sharp increase in Pyongyang’s reliance on its traditional communist ally.

Chinese officials argue that they have little influence over Pyongyang, as shown by the limited results of their years of effort to persuade North Korean leaders to emulate Beijing’s economic reform and opening policies.

However, food aid from China and South Korea, which supplied nearly 400,000 tons, last year allowed North Korea to order international aid agencies out of the country, curtailing the work of the WFP itself. Seoul recently suspended shipments of humanitarian aid to the North in a response to the missile tests that was also linked by some observers to Pyongyang’s ejection of aid groups. Fears have since grown of another food crisis in North Korea, after typhoons and floods that have wiped out crops in some areas.

Chinese officials yesterday declined to comment on their plans for food donations to North Korea, with one official of the Ministry of Commerce saying: “I can’t tell you. It’s a state secret.”

From the New York Times:

The biggest recipient of [UNWFP aid] was Ethiopia, followed by North Korea and Sudan. The report is at www.wfp.org/interfais.

Share