Archive for the ‘Fiscal & monetary policy’ Category

DPRK elevates status of national resource development office

Tuesday, December 28th, 2010

Institute for Far Eastern Studies (IFES)
NK Brief No. 10-12-22
12/22/2010

On December 1, the North Korean Supreme People’s Assembly Standing Committee announced an order to elevate the position of the National Resource Development Office, which is overseen by the Cabinet’s Ministry of Extractive Industry, to the Ministry of National Resource Development. According to the Korea Central News Agency, this measure is aimed at increasing development and export of underground resources as international sanctions against the North further limit Pyongyang’s access to foreign capital.

The regime’s focus on increasing earnings can be seen in Kim Jong Il’s on-site guidance trips, as well. The KCNA reported on December 3 that Kim had recently visited Danchon, South Hamgyong Province, touring the Danchon Magnesia Factory, the Danchon Mining Equipment Factory, and the Danchon Port facilities. During his visit to the magnesia factory, Kim Jong Il emphasized the need for increasing the production of quality asphalt. In addition, after receiving a report on the status of implementation of CNC in the Danchon Mining Equipment Factory, he stated, “The factory needs to normalize at a high level of mass production to turn out the necessary numbers of mining and processing equipment.” Upon reviewing the Danchon Port facilities, Kim Jong Il urged staff to work towards ensuring a loud chorus of boat whistles in the port for the upcoming 100th anniversary of the birth of Kim Il Sung in 2012.

U.S. financial sanctions levied against the North have made it difficult for Pyongyang to collect export earnings from its mining efforts, one of its key earners of foreign capital. In May of last year, when sanctions were strengthened in response to North Korea’s second nuclear test, European and even Chinese banks froze money transfers to North Korea. The [North] Korea Magnesia Clinker Manufacturing Group could not collect 4.6 million USD in earnings from the export of zinc to Europe. It appears that the North has tried to compensate for these losses by increasing the export of iron ore from Musan. Exports to China passing through the Musan customs office have more than doubled, rising from 1200 to 2500 tons per day.

The mines of Musan, holding more than seven billion tons of iron ore, are the North’s primary vehicle for earning foreign capital. In 2004, China’s Tonghua Steel and Iron Group signed a contract with North Korean authorities granting the group 50-year development rights at some key North Korean mines, and is planning to invest seven billion Yuan in developing the sites. Beijing plans to use the access to North Korean mines to meet some of the expected 80 million ton shortfall of iron ore in 2010. However, there are rumors that North Korea has canceled the contract with no explanation, causing much speculation about the direction of Pyongyang’s export strategy.

Share

An upbeat DPRK economic report from China…

Wednesday, December 22nd, 2010

A reporter in China feels the last year has been a good one for the DPRK (in economic terms).  I would take issue with some parts of his article (posted below), but the time I can devote to blogging is pretty slim until the end of January (field exam for school).  You are smart enough to form your own opinions in the meantime!

Here is the full article from China Daily:

Few people know that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) was a relatively prosperous country in the late 1970s and 1980s. In 1979, its grain output reached 9 million tons, increasing to 10 million tons in 1984. In fact, it used to be a rice exporter during that period.

The DPRK economy started declining in the 1990s when a lot of its resources were diverted to defense and heavy industries, seriously hindering the development of agriculture and light industries. Besides, environmental destruction damaged the rich soil, making it impossible for the country to return to its past agricultural glory.

As a result, the DPRK’s economy registered negative growth in the late 1990s, and didn’t improve until 2000.

In 2009, when the international community was still worried over its second nuclear test in May, the DPRK launched economic development campaigns such as the “150-day battle”, and vowed to make the year a turning point toward economic strength and prosperity.

Let’s see the changes in the country after more than one year of the campaigns.

This year has seen many changes in the DPRK. New technologies such as computerized numerical control have been introduced to help light industries, and more cash crops grown to raise funds or exchange them with other countries for grain.

The year has seen a remarkable increase in the number of neon lamps and lights on Pyongyang’s roads and in residential buildings. Thanks to the construction of hydropower stations such as the Huichon Power Station in Chagang province and Wonsan Youth Power Station in Kangwon province, Pyongyang and Kangwon’s Wonsan city now get relatively stable electricity supply.

A drastic change in the DPRK’s economy this year is the drop in the price of rice. The DPRK government has lowered the price of rationed rice from 46 won to 24 won a kg.

In the open market, rice price dropped from 2,000 won a kg in 2009 to 1,500 won a kg in September this year. In November, it fell further to 900 won a kg in Pyongyang’s markets.

The availability of consumer goods has increased both in variety and quantity because of more and improved supply channels. Residents now rely on goods rationed by the government, as well as those available in markets and convenience stores. More special shops are selling necessities, although they cost more than in ration shops.

Contrary to some experts’ prediction, currency reform has not created a crisis or led to economic depression in the country. In 2009, the exchange rate of the yuan to the won was 1:500. This year it is 1:200, more than doubling the purchasing power of people in the DPRK.

Moreover, even though the currency reform has shrunk people’s fortunes, most of them have not suffered economic shocks.

Several facts prove that the living standards in the DPRK have improved this year. The supply of DPRK-made beer has increased, in variety and volume both, and the country may not need to import beer anymore. A bottle of rice beer costs about 600 to 700 won. More restaurants have opened in cities, and bicycles have become common in places where they were rare to find earlier.

Even the number of cell phone users has increased – to at least 80,000 – though the 200,000 to 600,000 won needed to use a mobile phone is still high and the handsets and service need to be improved.

In more sense than one, this year has a special meaning for the DPRK, not least because it chose its next generation leader. The year marks the 65th anniversary of the ruling Labor Party, too.

Though the DPRK’s claim of building an economically prosperous country in two more years may be exaggerated, we can see some obvious changes in the country. It is opening up to the rest of the world and shifting its attention from defense to people’s welfare.

But there is no denying that the DPRK now wants to develop the economy. This will become clearer if one has followed the country’s official media. During the new year’s comment, the Korean Central News Agency used the words “improving people’s lives” 16 times, a rarity earlier. Even in 2009, the words were used only once.

The DPRK tried to increase people’s income in 2002 but failed because it didn’t have enough goods then. The high inflation that followed made things worse.

Though last year’s currency reform didn’t raise people’s income directly, it has defused the currency bubble to a large extent. And this time the supply of more goods to meet rising demands has helped the country to move forward.

The currency reform, despite some negative effects, has not only improved people’s living conditions, but also built a sound financial base for the DPRK to welcome international economic cooperation in the near future.

If time and conditions allow, economic interaction could help the DPRK maintain peace in the region. The possibility of the DPRK economy suffering a 2002-like setback, however, cannot be ruled out.

Its weak agriculture and light industries are still not in a condition to support development in the long term. Plus, it has to depend on imports for 80 percent of consumer goods in the short term.

But 2010 is still a special year for the DPRK, for it is standing at a crossroads from where it can start attracting investment because capital now holds the key.

That means opportunities for China. The market for consumer goods such as light bulbs and cell phones are expanding in the DPRK, while rising demand for other products has created a larger profit space. Besides, the DPRK could open its resource markets to raise funds.

The DPRK’s economic development is good for China’s security and overall economic cooperation in the entire region. The international community should use this opportunity to help the DPRK open up to the rest of world. That would go a long way in resolving the Korean Peninsula nuclear issue than flexing of military muscles.

Read the full story here:
DPRK at economic crossroads
China Daily
Jin Meihua
12/22/2010

Share

Recent papers on DPRK topics

Friday, December 17th, 2010

Forgotten People:  The Koreans of the Sakhalin Island in 1945-1991
Download here (PDF)
Andrei Lankov
December 2010

North Korea: Migration Patterns and Prospects
Download here (PDF)
Courtland Robinson, Center for Refugee and Disaster Response, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University
August, 2010

North Korea’s 2009 Nuclear Test: Containment, Monitoring, Implications
Download here (PDF)
Jonathan Medalia, Congressional Research Service
November 24, 2010

North Korea: US Relations, Nuclear Diplomacy, and Internal Situation
Download here (PDF)
Emma Chanlett-Avery, Congressional Research Service
Mi Ae-Taylor, Congressional Research Service
November 10, 2010

‘Mostly Propaganda in Nature:’ Kim Il Sung, the Juche Ideology, and the Second Korean War
Download here (PDF)
Wilson Center NKIDP
Mitchell Lerner

Drug Trafficking from North Korea: Implications for Chinese Policy
Read here at the Brookings Institution web page
Yong-an Zhang, Visiting Fellow, Foreign Policy, Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies
December 3, 2010

Additional DPRK-focused CRS reports can be found here.

The Wilson Center’s previous NKIDP Working Papers found here.

I also have many papers and publications on my DPRK Economic Statistics Page.

Share

North Korean restaurants generate revenue overseas

Wednesday, December 15th, 2010

According to the Choson Ilbo:

The Okryugwan chain of North Korean restaurants opened its first China branch in Beijing in 2003. Located in the Wangjing district, which has large numbers of Korean residents, it apparently makes more than W7 million (US$1=W1,141) a day in revenues.

The chain is most famous for naengmyeon or cold noodles, but its beef rib stew and kimchi are also popular, and customers can buy them to take home. Seasonal North Korean delicacies such as steamed crabs from the East Sea or wild mushrooms are also served.

So popular are the restaurants that a knockoff has popped up in Shanghai employing Korean Chinese instead of North Koreans.

North Korean restaurants are also famous for the performances put on by their staff, who sing not only their country’s folk and pop songs but also South Korean pop songs. Staff at the Shanghai Okryugwan reportedly sing even American pop songs like the “Titanic” theme.

Most of the North Korean staff are graduates of Jang Chol Gu University of Commerce or attended professional culinary school in Pyongyang. Earlier this year, a beautiful waitress at a North Korean restaurant in Siem Reap, Cambodia gained near-celebrity status in South Korea after a picture of her was posted on the Internet.

North Korean restaurants began opening overseas branches during the 1990s. Okryugwan has outlets in China, Vietnam, Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Mongolia, Russia, Nepal and Dubai. North Korean provincial governments, their affiliated agencies and other organizations raced to open restaurants abroad, and now there are more than 100.

Depending on the size of their staff, the restaurants must wire back between US$100,000 and $300,000 to North Korea each year. Those with poor revenues are forced to close, so they advertise heavily, even featuring ads in South Korean community journals abroad.

The North Korean staff have experience working at restaurants in Pyongyang and spend around three years abroad. Even if they come from privileged backgrounds in the North, they are still vulnerable to the temptations of capitalism. In Qingdao, China, a North Korean restaurant was forced to close for months because its staff absconded. Last week, the manager the Okryugwan in Nepal apparently fled to India with a stash of dollars that were supposed to be sent to the North.

But with a drop in the number of South Korean customers following North Korea’s artillery bombing of Yeonpyeong Island, compounded by the defections, North Korean restaurants abroad may face a cold winter.

Read the full story here:
Why N.Korea Values Its Restaurants Abroad
Choson Ilbo
Oh Tae-jin
12/15/2010

Share

Korean volatility affecting DPRK food prices and exchange rate

Wednesday, December 15th, 2010

According to the Daily NK:

North Korea’s attack on Yeonpyeong Island on November 23rd has caused a spate of rice price instability in the markets. Even though it is December, rice is now selling for around 1,300 won per kilo, as much as 500 won more than it was just one month ago.

This is contra to the normal trend, which is that the price of food generally declines because farmers on collective farms get food distribution from the state at this time.

A source from North Hamkyung Province explained the details to The Daily NK yesterday, saying, “The price of rice, which was between 800 and 900 won in mid-November, started going up on around the 23rd, and is now over 1,300 won.“

“People have been taken aback by the soaring food prices,” he added

According to the source, on the 8th and 9th the rice price in Hoiryeong Market apparently hit 1,900 won, the highest this year.

This phenomenon, which is rare but not unprecedented, seems to have been caused because the North Korean authorities are trying to raise domestic and international tension on the Korean Peninsula.

An example of this can be seen in a statement released by a North Korean “social organization”, Chosun Peace Protection National Committee, on the 11th, in which it proclaimed, “Our military and the people are both prepared for either expanded skirmishes or all-out war.”

Elsewhere, people’s unit lectures over the last few weeks have focused on asserting phrases like this one, heard in a northern provincial city lecture, “Since the current situation is extremely tense, you have to live lives appropriate to that tension.”

This atmosphere naturally has spilled over into the markets, where food wholesalers and the “donju,” holders of large amounts of capital, have reacted negatively, according to the source, who explained, “The latest mood is similar to the time when the authorities declared a ‘Quasi-war Footing’ in 1993. As the atmosphere gets more serious, money holders begin to obtain and cling onto foreign currency, so foreign currency dealing and circulation volumes fall and food trade is choked off. Therefore, rice prices soar.”

In additional, military tensions between North and South are having an influence on trade between the North and China, so the amount of Yuan flowing into North Korea has also shrunk, which is another cause of rising currency exchange rates and therefore domestic rice prices.

The source said, “People are saying that this happened because of the gunfight between the North and South,” going on, “For this troubling rumor that a war could break out, smuggling volumes between North Korea and China have also shrunk.”

Although rice has now settled back to 1300 won from its high of 1900 won, the source said many people are still concerned for the winter season.

“Since the 10th, the Yuan has gone down to 330 or 340 won, so the rice price has dropped to around 1,300 won accordingly,” the source said. “But we are worried about whether or not we can afford to eat enough corn porridge this winter.”

The Daily NK has also conducted an additional investigation of currency rates and rice prices in Pyongyang, Shinuiju and Hyesan, comparing December 7th to 13th with November 24th to 30th, to check the effect of this trend across the country.

In the North Korean capital, one U.S. dollar has increased from 1,400 won to 1,750 won, while rice has gone from 750 won to 1,250 won per kilo.

In Shinuiju, meanwhile, both foreign currency exchange rates and rice prices are marginally worse again, moving from 1,450 to 1,800 won per dollar and from 800 won to 1,300 won per kilo respectively, while in Hyesan, the dollar exchange rate mirrored that in Pyongyang, but rice had been hardest hit, going from 900 won to 1,350 won.

Additionally, in Shinuiju on the 9th one Yuan had soared to 420 won, near the level of the period before the redenomination.

This December 2010 price trend is occurring for the third time since 2000. The first was in December, 2005 when the authorities stopped all food trade because the state apparently planned to resume full food distribution. Thereafter, rice prices almost doubled. The second time was in December last year, a phenomenon caused by a measure shutting down the market following the currency redenomination.

According to the Korea Times:

North Korean merchants are exchanging their local currency en masse as war jitters in the wake of Pyongyang’s attack on Yeonpyeong Island have stoked fears that the won may lose its value in the case of war, a report said.

According to North Korea Intellectuals Solidarity (NKIS), a Seoul-based NGO comprised of defectors with lines into the North, currency exchange rates have skyrocketed since the Nov. 23 incident. One hundred yuan, which before the shelling went for 2,000 won, is now worth 35,000 won, NKIS said in a report released Sunday.

“Merchants have heard rumors that if there is war, North Korean bills will become worthless scraps of paper,” NKIS quoted a source as saying, causing traders to exchange their won while they can.

Price of daily goods have also skyrocketed, the report said, with rice jumping from 900 won per kilogram to 1,600 won. Corn climbed from 4,000 won per kilogram to 6,000 won, it said.

The source said the soaring prices have been caused by jitters in the market over the heightened tensions in the wake of the Nov. 23 attack, saying the North’s military has been in a “quasi state of war” since the incident.

The rumors that the won will lose its value in case of a war have slowed market activities as merchants have raised prices and are waiting to see if further military action is on the cards.

Traders in China, from who markets in the North secure much of their goods, have also become reluctant to make transactions involving North Korean currency and are trading what won they have, the source said.

The price jump comes on the heels of reportedly enormous inflation caused by a botched currency reform last year.

The regime redenominated banknotes at a ratio of 100:1 in November last year in a move to squelch a bourgeoning private sector. But the move led to runaway inflation as the price soared by some forty times within the year, according to reports.

The U.N. estimated last month that some 5 million North Koreans will face food shortages this year due to lack of staple grains, while the economy is believed to be suffering heavily from international sanctions imposed for the regime’s missile and nuclear tests.

Meanwhile, Pyongyang, which claims Seoul instigated the shelling by firing into its territory during a military drill, continued to threaten the South over the weekend, saying, “The army and the people of the DPRK are ready for both an escalation and an all-out war.”

According to the Institute for Far Eastern Studies:

After North Korea rained artillery onto Yeonpyeong Island, military tensions have continued to grow, impacting the price of rice and the currency exchange rate in the North”s traditional markets. On December 13, NK Intellectual Solidarity reported that this has shaken the livelihoods on North Korean people. According to the group, rice has shot up 77 percent, from 900 won to 1600 won per kilogram, since the November 23 attack. The price of corn has also gone up by 50 percent, to 600 won per kilogram. At the same time, the exchange rate for Chinese yuan has risen, at least in the market in Hyeryong, from 220 to 350 won per yuan, a 59 percent increase.

Daily NK has also reported that post-Yeonpyeong food price increases have been significant, and as the Autumn harvest comes to a close in December, smaller rations to those working on collective farms is expected. A contact in North Hamgyong Province reported, “Rice prices that were 800-900 won [ per kilogram] in mid-November shot up to 1100 won and have recently risen to 1300 won…people are reeling at the sudden rise in prices.” According to the source, rice hit a high of 1900 won in the Hyeryong market around December 8-9.

The very first to reflect military tensions between the to Koreas were money handlers and wholesalers. A source in North Korea compared today”s atmosphere with that experienced in 1993, and explained that as people”s concerns about war increase, money traders become more conservative, tightening up the exchange of currency and therefore slowing the entire wholesale market, driving up prices. A survey by DailyNK from December 7-13 revealed that the exchange rate in Pyongyang rose from 1400 to 1750 won between November 24 and the end of the month, while the price of rice rose from 750 won to 1250 won per kilogram over the same period. In Sinuiji, the exchange rate rose from 1450 to 1800 won, while rice costs went up from 800 to 1300 won per kilogram. Hyesan showed similar trends, with the exchange rate rising from 1400 to 1800 won and rice rising from 900 to 1350 won per kilogram.

While food prices have fallen from their peak after the Yeonpyeong shelling, they are still high enough to cause significant difficulties for the average North Korean. Price hikes seen recently are three times as severe as those seen from 2000-2010, including the huge jump seen in 2005 when authorities attempted to reintroduce the central rationing system. Combined with last year”s failed currency reform attempt, the latest price hikes have severely strained the livelihoods of most North Koreans.

UPDATE: From the Institute for Far Eastern Studies

DPRK prices, exchange rate, skyrocket after shelling
Institute for Far Eastern Studies (IFES)
NK Brief No. 10-12-15
12/15/2010

After North Korea rained artillery onto Yeonpyeong Island, military tensions have continued to grow, impacting the price of rice and the currency exchange rate in the North”s traditional markets. On December 13, NK Intellectual Solidarity reported that this has shaken the livelihoods on North Korean people. According to the group, rice has shot up 77 percent, from 900 won to 1600 won per kilogram, since the November 23 attack. The price of corn has also gone up by 50 percent, to 600 won per kilogram. At the same time, the exchange rate for Chinese yuan has risen, at least in the market in Hyeryong, from 220 to 350 won per yuan, a 59 percent increase.

Daily NK has also reported that post-Yeonpyeong food price increases have been significant, and as the Autumn harvest comes to a close in December, smaller rations to those working on collective farms is expected. A contact in North Hamgyong Province reported, “Rice prices that were 800-900 won [ per kilogram] in mid-November shot up to 1100 won and have recently risen to 1300 won…people are reeling at the sudden rise in prices.” According to the source, rice hit a high of 1900 won in the Hyeryong market around December 8-9.

The very first to reflect military tensions between the to Koreas were money handlers and wholesalers. A source in North Korea compared today”s atmosphere with that experienced in 1993, and explained that as people”s concerns about war increase, money traders become more conservative, tightening up the exchange of currency and therefore slowing the entire wholesale market, driving up prices. A survey by DailyNK from December 7-13 revealed that the exchange rate in Pyongyang rose from 1400 to 1750 won between November 24 and the end of the month, while the price of rice rose from 750 won to 1250 won per kilogram over the same period. In Sinuiji, the exchange rate rose from 1450 to 1800 won, while rice costs went up from 800 to 1300 won per kilogram. Hyesan showed similar trends, with the exchange rate rising from 1400 to 1800 won and rice rising from 900 to 1350 won per kilogram.

While food prices have fallen from their peak after the Yeonpyeong shelling, they are still high enough to cause significant difficulties for the average North Korean. Price hikes seen recently are three times as severe as those seen from 2000-2010, including the huge jump seen in 2005 when authorities attempted to reintroduce the central rationing system. Combined with last year”s failed currency reform attempt, the latest price hikes have severely strained the livelihoods of most North Koreans.

Read the full stories here:
Tensions Driving Rice Price and Exchange Rate Hikes
Daily NK
Yoo Gwan Hee
12/14/2010

DPRK prices, exchange rate skyrocket after shelling
Institute for Far Eastern Studies (IFES)
NK Brief No. 10-12-15
12/15/2010

‘Yeonpyeong shelling causes inflation in Pyongyang’
Korea Times
Kim Young-jin
12/13/2010

Share

Park’s Appearance Unlikely to Mean Real Reform

Monday, December 13th, 2010

According to the Daily NK:

An oft-cited example of an advocate of reform within the North Korean leadership, former Prime Minister Park Bong Ju [aka Pak Pong-ju] appeared alongside Kim Jong Il during a recent onsite inspection at a Pyongyang sock factory, leading to suggestions that North Korea may again be contemplating the idea of embracing economic reform.

However, this is less likely than another explanation; that Park was brought back into the fold to oversee a number of revisions to the legal code during 2010.

Park, whose appearance at the onsite inspection was verified in five images broadcast by Chosun Central Television on the 11th, was a leading architect of the July 1st Economic Management Reform Measure of 2002, which formalized a number of relatively liberal economic policies.

He then became Prime Minister in September 2003, but was deposed during a period of economic retrenchment in April 2007, sent into virtual exile in South Pyongan Province as manager of Suncheon Vinalon Complex.

As a result of this career path, Park is seen by many as a reformist thinker in the North Korean elite.

Therefore, when he stepped back onto the main political stage this August, three years and four months later, mentioned in a report published by Chosun Central News Agency on August 21st about the 50th anniversary of a well-known Pyongyang restaurant, Okryugwan, it led to suggestions that North Korea might be set to head down the road to economic reform, led by Park as Party First Vice Director.

However, Park’s re-emergence does not mean that North Korea is about to turn towards market mechanisms on an official basis; conversely, it is more likely to be related to the revision this year of a number of laws which were actually designed to strengthen the control and supervisory functions of state institutions.

North Korea officially revised the People’s Economic Planning Law on April 6th alongside the Pyongyang Management Law, revised on March 30th, and both its Labor Protection and Chamber of Commerce and Industry Laws, revised on July 8th.

In revealing the legal revisions to The Daily NK in an interview in November, an inside North Korean source commented on the intention behind the changes, saying, “The People’s Economic Planning Law of 2001 alleviated national controls and supervision, even though it came before the July 1st measure of 2002. However, the revised bill strengthens national controls.”

Additionally, the source went on, “This series of bills including the revised People’s Economic Planning Law are the basis of the nation’s control, management and supervision. It should be understood as being part of the same flow as the series of measures undertaken during the succession process since October of 2007, when market controls began wholeheartedly; the 150-day Battle, 100-day Battle and currency redenomination.”

Accordingly, research suggests that North Korea probably chose to play the Park Bong Ju card now to revise state policy to try and sort out the problems left behind by the failure of the 2009 currency redenomination and to address the pressing need to improve the state of the domestic economy, whilst also hoping that the appointment of an official with a reformist image might attract investment from Northeast China and further afield.

Michael Madden has written a bio of Pak Pong-ju. Read it here.

Read the full Daily NK sotry below:
Park’s Appearance Unlikely to Mean Real Reform
Daily NK
Kim So-yeol
12/13/2010

Share

Untangling a North Korean Missile Business

Monday, December 6th, 2010

According to the New York Times:

Suppliers of Precision Machinery
North Korea needs supplies and machinery to make its missiles. The cables indicate that precision metal machinery like hydraulic presses has been supplied by Taiwanese companies; tons of specialized steel has been routed from China; unspecified goods came from Japan; and computerized lathes were sold by a Swiss company.

Suppliers of Parts
North Korea cannot provide all the components its missile customers need. The cables outline how North Korea sought to sell a mobile missile launcher to Yemen. It arranged for a MAZ-543 engine and a ZIL-131 truck from a Russian company, which was to be shipped from Odessa, Ukraine, to Al Hudaydah, Yemen.

Markets for the Missiles
North Korea’s customers for missiles and other weaponry include countries mainly in the Middle East, Africa and Asia. They have included Iran, Egypt, Uganda, Yemen and Sri Lanka. The cables also outline the tracking of a North Korean ship suspected of carrying weapons, possibly for Angola or the Democratic Republic of Congo.

The Money Flow
The cables outline how the United States suspects money has flowed through bank accounts in well-established financial institutions so North Korea can buy supplies, and customers can pay for missiles. These have included bank accounts in Germany, Hong Kong and Japan.

Regarding the hydraulic presses, these could be domestically sourced. The DPRK media regularly features innovations in press machines.

The government of Myanmar is also a purchaser of conventional weaponry. Here is a post on one of their shopping trips in the DPRK.

Read the full story here:
Untangling a North Korean Missile Business
New York Times
12/6/2010

Share

ROK financial transfers to the DPRK

Friday, December 3rd, 2010

According to the Choson Ilbo:

South Korea gave North Korea an astronomical US$2.98 billion during the Kim Dae-jung and Roh Moo-hyun administrations from 1998-2008, according to a government tally announced Thursday. That is 1.5 times more than the amount of aid China gave to North Korea over the same period, which totaled $1.9 billion.

The government and private businesses gave North Korea $1.84 billion through commercial trade, $544.23 million for package tours to the Mt. Kumgang resort, $450 million for an inter-Korean summit, $41.31 million in land use fees and wages for North Korean workers at the Kaesong Industrial Complex and $30.03 million as part of various social and cultural exchanges, according to internal documents of the Unification Ministry and other government agencies.

Funds to Develop Nuclear Weapons

“North Korea is believed to have spent $500-600 million to develop long-range missiles and $800-900 million to develop nuclear weapons,” a South Korean government source said. “And the cash provided by South Korea could have been used to develop them.”

Former government officials during the previous administrations deny this. Lee Jae-joung, a former unification minister, said in a lecture in July last year, “It’s frustrating to hear claims that North Korea conducted nuclear tests using money that the Kim Dae-jung and Roh Moo-hyun administrations gave. So far the government offered cash to North Korea only once.”

He claims that the government was not responsible for paying North Korea $450 million for the first inter-Korean summit in 2000 as that was provided by private businesses together with the cash for the Mt. Kumgang package tours and the Kaesong Industrial Complex.

However, the whereabouts of the cash payment of $400,000 Lee admits to is also uncertain. That was the money North Korea demanded in April 2007 to build a video-link center for the reunions of families separated by the Korean War. North Korea has yet to start construction. “I think they just extorted the money,” a South Korean government official said.

Hungry for Cash

“North Korea demanded money for every event,” said one Unification Ministry official who was in charge of humanitarian cooperation projects during the Roh administration. “We got the feeling that North Korea was trying to use the reunions of families separated by the Korean War as a means to make money.” The North even demanded that South Korea pay $1,000 for each video clip exchanged by families in addition to all of the filming and editing equipment as part of a project back in 2007 that would allow some separated families to stay in touch via video messages, the official said.

A National Assembly audit in 2006 revealed how North Korea made money off South Korean broadcasters. A key example is the W1 billion (US$1=W1,149) that state-run South Korean broadcaster KBS gave North Korea in 2003 to record a TV show about a singing contest in Pyongyang to mark Liberation Day.

In 2005, SBS gave W700 million in cash and W200 million worth of paint and other goods to North Korea for a concert in the North Korean capital by South Korean singer Cho Yong-pil, while in 2002, MBC paid the North W320 million in cash and provided 5,000 TV sets (worth W734 million) for two concerts in Pyongyang by South Korean singers Lee Mi-ja and Yoon Do-hyun.

North Korea also received sizable amounts from South Korean businesses and civic groups through unofficial channels or backroom deals. “Many business owners in the South had problems managing their companies because North Korea habitually made excessive demands for money,” said Cho Bong-hyun, a researcher at the Industrial Bank of Korea’s economic research center

This suggests that a considerable amount of bribes were paid. One South Korean owner of a garment company that was based in Pyongyang said, “Bribes South Korean businesses paid in the early stages to prevent any problems later became customary. After North Korean officials got a taste of the money, they ended up asking for bribes first.”

A Unification Ministry official said, “It’s impossible to estimate how much money was given to North Korea through unofficial channels. We can’t even trace the use of official government money given to North Korea, such as the $400,000 for building a video-link center for the family reunions, so there is no way of telling what happened to money handed over under the table.”

Read the full story here:
S.Korea Paid Astronomical Sums to N.Korea
Choson Ilbo
12/3/2010

Share

DPRK bank transfers for nuclear program alarms EU

Thursday, December 2nd, 2010

According to Bloomberg:

North Korea’s use of international banks to facilitate nuclear weapons-related trade requires financial institutions to step up their vigilance, the European Union said.

North Korea exports $100 million in weapons and missiles each year in violation of United Nations sanctions, a UN panel wrote in a report released on Nov. 10. The EU said it’s concerned that some of the country’s trade involves prohibited nuclear technologies.

The 27-nation EU today urged all members of the International Atomic Energy Agency to “exercise particular vigilance over exports and financial transfers” in order “to prevent a contribution to proliferation-sensitive activities.”

Tensions with North Korea have increased in recent weeks. The country has built a new facility for extracting uranium, the key ingredient for nuclear weapons, a U.S. scientist reported on Nov. 20. Three days later, North Korea fired artillery at Yeonpyeong island, killing soldiers and civilians.

North Korea’s new nuclear facilities “could bolster its pursuit of a weapons capability and increases our concerns about prospects for onward proliferation of fissile material and of sensitive technologies to other parties,” U.S. Ambassador Glynn Davies said in a statement at IAEA’s meeting in Vienna.

The U.S. has been pressuring banks to cut ties with the North Korea’s regime, State Department documents posted today on WikiLeaks.org showed.

Reputation

Austria’s Financial Market Authority told the U.S. that it “exercised additional surveillance regarding North Korean financial activities” and that one bank cut ties with the country “to maintain its good reputation,” according to a February 2006 cable.

The U.S. and Japan will hold a week of naval drills beginning tomorrow. The aircraft carrier USS George Washington will join a force of about 400 aircraft and 60 warships. Drills will include responding to ballistic missile attacks on Pacific islands, the Joint Staff of the Japan Self-Defense Forces said in a statement.

“We will not accept North Korea as a nuclear-weapon state,” Davies said. “We seek an immediate halt of all nuclear activities in North Korea, including enrichment.”

Recent posts about the DPRK’s nuclear program can be found here. 

Recent posts on Yonpyong can be found here.

Read the full story here:
North Korean Use of Bank Transfers for Atomic Work Alarms Europe
Bloomberg
Jennifer M. Freedman, Andrew Atkinson
12/2/2010

Share

Rice price up 40-fold in last year

Thursday, December 2nd, 2010

According ot the Korea Herald:

The price of rice in North Korea has soared nearly 40-fold in the year after the country’s botched currency reform.

Rice is now traded at around 900 North Korean won per kilogram in Pyongyang’s markets, according to online media outlet Daily NK. This is up 3,990 percent from 22 won late November last year in the newly introduced currency.

The North knocked two zeros off the face value of its old currency on Nov. 30 last year, exchanging 100-won bills for new 1-won notes. Therefore the price of a kilogram of rice, which was 2,200 won in the old currency, was redenominated to 22 won.

Under the currency reform plan, a 100-won note in the new currency should have the exchangeable value of a 10,000-won bill in the old currency. However, due to 4,000 percent inflation, the new 100-won note is now only worth 250 won in the old currency.

The price of rice in North Korea is deemed the benchmark of all prices in commercial trade.

“The apparent purpose of the North Korean currency reform was to reduce the amount of money in the markets to stabilize prices, but it failed to achieve this due to an absolute lack of commodity supplies,” said Cho Myung-chul, a senior fellow at the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.

“The fact that rice prices jumped 4,000 percent based on the currency’s exchangeable value shows that the effect of the 100-fold revaluation has mostly disappeared.”

After major markets in the reclusive state were shut down in mid-January this year, rice prices in Pyongyang soared, hitting 1,300 won per kilo in early March. They dropped to the 400-won range in May as markets began to function again, but soared over the 1,000-won mark in August due to an exchange rate hike and damage caused by heavy rains.

When the North redenominated its currency, it placed a cap on the amount of money that could be converted per person, telling people to deposit the rest in state-run banks.

The measure, which was aimed at crippling the growing merchant class and reasserting control over market activities, tightened the distribution of food and stirred anti-regime sentiment.

This Daily NK story asserts that the average salary of a general worker is around 1,500 won a month, and it is not paid regularly.

Read the full story here:
N.K. rice price soars nearly 40-fold in a year
Korea Herald
Kim So-hyun
11/20/2010

Share