Foreign direct investment « North Korean Economy Watch

Archive for the ‘Foreign direct investment’ Category

Expansion of Kaesong Site to Resume by April

Tuesday, February 20th, 2007

Korea Times
Lee Jin-woo
2/20/2007

Unification Minister Lee Jae-joung said Tuesday the ministry would resume the halted expansion of a joint industrial complex in the North Korean city of Kaesong no later than mid-April.

Last September, the South Korean government decided to hold off expanding the Kaesong complex because of heightened tension on the Korean Peninsula after the North’s test-firing of seven missiles in July. After Pyongyang’s first-ever underground nuclear test on Oct. 9, tensions increased further.

Minister Lee had been negative about the expansion of the joint business venture, saying more progress in the six-party talks as a prerequisite condition to proceed with the plan.

“We’ve already completed preparing some 3.3 million square meters of land there with almost perfect water and electricity supply,” Lee said in a press briefing at the ministry in Seoul. “Considering its important role for small- and medium-sized South Korean companies, I believe we should resume the expansion plan late next month or mid-April at the latest.”

The Kaesong site is one of two major cross-border projects South Korea has kept afloat despite the chilly inter-Korean relations. The two Koreas are also runing a joint tourism project at Mt. Kumgang in North Korea.

When fully expanded by 2012, the complex is expected to house about 2,000 South Korean manufacturers employing about half a million North Koreans, according to the Ministry of Unification.

The minister also said another inter-Korean summit would be a very useful tool to boost a more reconciliatory atmosphere on the Korean Peninsula, but said the government is not making any efforts to prepare for one.

“Just like the historic summit in June 2000 did, another inter-Korean summit would play a crucial role in bringing peace and prosperity between the two Koreas without a doubt,” Lee said.

“However, an agreement between the leaders of the two Koreas is necessary to realize another summit. We’re not currently working on the issue with North Korea.”

Lee also said South and North Korea should play a leading role in forming a separate peace forum among nations participating in the nuclear disarmament talks. The establishment of the peace forum was mentioned in an agreement made in Sept. 19, 2005, which laid out the course for North Korea’s eventual denuclearization.

“I’m not sure exactly how many nations will take part in the forum to guarantee peace on the Korean Peninsula. It could be four including the two Koreas, the United States and China,” Lee said. “However, Seoul and Pyongyang should play a leading role in preparing the forum.”

Lee said, if last week’s agreement in the six-party talks is carried out as planned, the two Koreas should begin to set up the peace forum at the same time.

On Feb. 13, the North pledged to take the first steps toward dismantling its nuclear program in return for energy aid and other humanitarian assistance during the six-party talks.

Land for S. Korean companies in Kaesong complex on sale next month: ministry
Yonhap
2/20/2007

South Korea’s Unification Ministry said Tuesday that it plans to parcel out a 530,000-pyeong lot for South Korean manufacturers in the inter-Korean industrial complex in Kaesong late next month. One pyeong is 3.3 square meters.

The land is the remainder of the 1-million-pyeong lot which the South and North Korean governments have been jointly developing in the western North Korean border town in the first phase of the inter-Korean project which is to construct a 20-million-pyeong industrial base for South Korean companies by 2012. The complex, if completed, is expected to employ as many as half a million North Korean workers for some 2,000-3,000 South Korean manufacturers.

The government originally planned to sell the lot in three stages last year, but had to put it off amid inter-Korean tension caused by the North’s missile and nuclear tests.

“I believe it’s proper to sell the lot as early as the end of next month,” Unification Minister Lee Jae-joung said, citing his report submitted to President Roh Moo-hyun on Feb. 6 on his agency’s business for this year.

The Kaesong Industrial Complex is one of the two major cross-border projects that South Korea has kept afloat in spite of U.S. opposition. The two Koreas also run a joint tourism project at the North’s scenic Mount Geumgang.

In the industrial complex, South Korean businesses use cheap but skilled North Korean labor to produce goods. Currently, 21 labor-intensive South Korean factories employ about 11,160 North Korean workers.

But U.S. hard-liners criticize the complex, claiming that the factories where North Korean workers earn about US$60 per month are actually channels to funnel much-needed hard currency to the tyrannical North Korean regime.

Posted in Economic reform, Foreign direct investment, Kaesong Industrial Complex (KIC), Special Economic Zones (Established before 2013) | Comments Closed

Land Leasing Law

Sunday, February 11th, 2007

From Naenara:

The DPRK Law on the Leasing of Land was adopted by Resolution No. 40 of the Standing Committee of the Supreme People’s Assembly on October 27, 1993, and amended by Decree No. 484 of the Presidium of the Supreme People’s Assembly on February 26, 1999.

The law consists of 42 articles in 6 chapters.

Chapter 1. Fundamentals (Articles 1~8)

This chapter stipulates that the mission of the law is to contribute to establishing a proper system in the leasing of land needed for foreign investors and foreign-invested enterprises and for use of the leased land.

A foreign corporate body or individual may lease and use land in the DPR Korea and the lessee has the right to use the land leased. When land is leased, natural resources and deposits in the land leased are not covered by the right to use land. The term of lease is fixed by agreement between the contracting parties within the limit of 50 years.

Chapter 2. Ways of leasing land (Articles 9~14)

This chapter defines the ways of leasing land.

It stipulates that the leasing of land should be undertaken through consultation or by means of tender or auction. It also notes that the lessor should provide the lessee with the data like the location and area of the land and its topographical map, uses to which the land may be put, the building area, a plan for development of the land, the period during which construction must be completed and the minimum amount of investment required, the requirements for environmental protection, hygiene and anti-epidemics and fire prevention, the term of lease of the land and the state of development of the land.

The lessee must use land in accordance with the contract for use of land. A lessee who wishes to alter the use of land must conclude a supplementary contract with the lessor.

Chapter. 3 Transfer and mortgage of the right to use land (Articles 15-27)

This chapter stipulates that the lessee is permitted, with the approval of the lessor; to transfer (by means of selling, re-leasing, donation or inheritance) or mortgage to a third party the right to use a part or the whole of the land leased and defines in detail the problems arising in the transfer and mortgage of the right to use land.

It also prescribes the condition for transferring the right to use land, the limits of its transfer and the procedure for the sale of the right to use land.

The lessee is allowed to sell, re-lease, donate or mortgage the leased land only after paying the total amount of charge for transferring the right to use land stipulated in the contract for leasing the land and making the contracted investment. In case of the transfer of the right to use land, the rights and obligations relating to the use of the land, and the structures and other appurtenance on it, are also transferred.

When a lessee sells the right to use land, the lessor has the preferential right to buy it.

The chapter also notes that the lessee may re-lease the land leased observing due formalities and defines the procedures for mortgaging the right to use land.

A lessee may mortgage the right to use land with the purpose of obtaining a loan from a bank or other financial institutions. In this case the mortgagor and the mortgagee must conclude a contract for the mortgage in accordance with the terms of the contract for leasing the land. The two contracting parties must register the mortgaged right with the relevant lessor within 10 days.

If the right to use land is mortgaged, the structures and other appurtenance on the land are also mortgaged with the land. When concluding a contract for the mortgage, the mortgagee may request the mortgagor the contract for leasing the land, a copy of the transfer contract, a copy of the certificate for use of the land or other information relating to the current state of the land.

The chapter defines the right of mortgagee when the right to use land is mortgaged as well.

The mortgagee may dispose of the right to use the land mortgaged by contract, as well as the structures and other appurtenance of the land in accordance with the mortgage contract if the mortgagor fails to pay the amount due by the expiry of the mortgage, or if business has been dissolved or gone bankrupt during the period of the mortgage contract. One who has won the right to use land and the structures and other appurtenance on it disposed of by the mortgagee must receive attestation from a notary office, register the change with the registration office and use the land in accordance with the contract for leasing the land.

The mortgagor is not permitted to remortgage or transfer the right to use land during the period of contract without the approval of the mortgagee.

Chapter 4. Rent of land (Articles 28-33)

This chapter notes that the lessee must pay rent for the leased land to the lessor. When leasing developed land, the lessor will receive from the lessee the charge for transferring the right to use land plus the cost of land development. The lessee must pay the total amount of charge for transferring the right to use land within 90 days of signing the contract for leasing land. If the charge is not paid before the prescribed deadline, the lessor must demand additional payment equivalent to 0.1% of the overdue rent on a daily basis, starting from the first day of default.

A lessee who has been leased land through consultation or auction must pay to the lessor a guaranty equivalent to 10% of the charge for transferring the right to use land, within 15 days of the conclusion of the contract for leasing the land. The user of the land leased should pay annually land use charge. In this case, for those who invest in priority sectors and in the Rason economic and trade zone, land use charges may be reduced or exempted for up to 10 years.

Chapter 5. Return of the right to use land (Articles 34~38)

This chapter provides that the right to use land automatically returns to the lessor on the expiry of the term of the lease stipulated in the contract. The structures and other appurtenance on the land also return, without compensation being paid.

The chapter defines the procedure for canceling the registration of the right to use land, extension of the term of land lease, the expense for the withdrawal and clearance of the leased land and the cancellation of the right to use the leased land.

Chapter 6. Penalties and settlement of disputes (Articles 39-42)

This chapter specifies that if a lessee illegally uses land without the certificate for the use of land, or changes the use of land or transfers or mortgages the right to use land without approval, he must be fined, have the facilities on the land confiscated or be required to restore the land to its original state, and the contract for transfer or mortgage be declared null and void.

The chapter also stipulates the ways of depriving the lessee of the right to use land, appealing to or filing a suit on it and settling the disputes.

In case of a failure to invest 50% of the total sum of investment during the period prescribed in the contract for the leasing of land, or to develop the land as contracted, the lessee may be deprived of the right to use land.

If the lessee disagrees with the penalty imposed on him, he may appeal to an institution senior to the one that has imposed sanctions or file a suit with an appropriate court within 20 days of the receipt of the notice of penalty.

Disagreements arising in leasing land or transferring and mortgaging leased land to a third party must be settled through consultation.

In case of failure in consultation, they must be settled through arbitration or legal procedures provided by the DPRK, or may be taken to an arbitration body in a third country for settlement.

The DPRK Law on the Leasing of Land contributes to establishing a proper system and order in the leasing of land needed for foreign investors and foreign-invested enterprises in order to secure their investment and activities.

Posted in Economic reform, Foreign direct investment, Law on Land Leasing | Comments Closed

Foreign Rating Agency Executives Visit Kaesong

Friday, February 9th, 2007

Korea Times
Lee Jin-woo
2/9/2007

A group of 17 people including high-level executives from Moody’s Investors Service and Goldman Sachs made a half-day visit to the joint industrial complex in the North Korean border city of Kaesong on Friday, the Ministry of Unification said.

Three executives from each company were accompanied by officials from the Ministry of Finance and Economy as well as the Ministry of Unification.

The short trip was part of the foreign rating agencies’ annual meeting on South Korea’s sovereign rating.

During the visit, they received a briefing from officials of the Kaesong Industiral District Management Committee, which manages the site’s development process, and looked around the first completed district of the industrial complex.

The government has had to hold off its plan to sell the first batch of some 1 million pyong (3.3 million square meters) of land to South Korean companies that wished to move into the industrial complex.

The plan was initially scheduled in June last year, but was suspended indefinitely due to signs of a North Korean missile test. Pyongyang pushed ahead with its plan and test-fired seven ballistic missiles on July 5, which was then followed by its first-ever nuclear test on Oct. 9.

Moody’s upgraded South Korea’s rating to A3 in March 2002, its seventh-highest investment grade.

Officials, however, were cautious about the chances for a higher sovereign rating.

“It remains to be seen whether Moody’s will upgrade South Korea’s credit rating, but it’s true that they react quite sensitively to geopolitical issues related to North Korea,” said a ranking official of the finance ministry.

Another official expected a positive effect from the visit, saying “The outcome of the ongoing six-party talks in Beijing is most important without a doubt, but this trip will help officials of the foreign rating agencies have a better understanding of our efforts and faith in inter-Korean business projects.”

The number of North Koreans working for the 18 South Korean firms at the industrial complex surpassed 10,000 late last year.

By 2012, the complex is expected to house about 2,000 South Korean manufacturers employing about half a million North Koreans, according to the Ministry of Unification.

Posted in Economic reform, Foreign direct investment, Kaesong Industrial Complex (KIC), Special Economic Zones (Established before 2013) | Comments Closed

Foreign Rating Agency Officials to Visit Kaesong

Tuesday, February 6th, 2007

Korea Times
Lee Jin-woo
2/6/2007

High-level executives from Moody’s Investors Service and Goldman Sachs will visit a joint industrial complex in the North Korean border city of Kaesong on Friday, the Ministry of Unification said Tuesday.

The delegation includes Thomas Byrne, a senior credit officer for Korean affairs at the global credit appraiser Moody’s.

Three executives from each financial company will visit the Kaesong Industrial Complex accompanied by officials from the Ministry of Finance and Economy.

The half-day visit is part of the foreign rating agency’s annual meeting on South Korea’s sovereign rating. The Moody’s delegation will visit Seoul from Feb. 9-14.

The visit is aimed at observing North Korea’s economic situation and attitude toward economic reform, sources said.

North Korean officials are positive about the visit, a source said. The Stalinist state has not issued an invitation for the delegation as of 2 p.m. Tuesday.

Moody’s delegates will meet with officials from the Finance Ministry, the National Assembly, the Bank of Korea and other government offices in Seoul from Feb. 12-14.

In the meetings, the two sides will discuss South Korea’s macroeconomic policies, fiscal stability, ongoing negotiations on a U.S.-South Korea free trade agreement and the North Korean nuclear issue.

Moody’s upgraded South Korea’s rating to A3 in March 2002, its seventh-highest investment grade.

Moody’s Investors Service is a credit rating, research and risk analysis company. It has more than 9,000 customer accounts and employs more than 2,400 people, including more than 1,000 analysts, according to its Web site.

The Seoul branch of Goldman Sachs did not provide much detail on the scheduled visit.

The number of North Koreans working for the 18 South Korean firms at the industrial complex surpassed 10,000 late last year.

In 2012, the complex is expected to house about 2,000 South Korean manufacturers employing about half a million North Koreans, according to the Ministry of Unification.

Posted in Economic reform, Finance, Foreign direct investment, Kaesong Industrial Complex (KIC), Special Economic Zones (Established before 2013) | Comments Closed

U.S. might consider Kaesong goods to be South Korean: Vershbow

Monday, February 5th, 2007

Yonhap
2/5/2007

The United States may recognize goods produced at a joint industrial complex just north of the border as South Korean if there is a change in circumstances, the top U.S. diplomat here said Monday.

In a one-hour meeting with Unification Minister Lee Jae-joung, U.S. Ambassador Alexander Vershbow said that while it is unrealistic to recognize the goods made in the border city of Kaesong as South Korean, there is room left to negotiate within the proposed free trade agreement (FTA) between the two countries, Unification Ministry officials said.

“Lee stressed that U.S. recognition of the goods produced in Kaesong as South Korean will contribute to bringing about a lasting peace on the Korean Peninsula. Vershbow said ‘if,’ but he did not elaborate on what kind of change under what kind of circumstances,” said a ministry official who was present at the meeting, but who asked to remain anonymous.

So far, the U.S. has avoided placing the issue on the official agenda of the FTA negotiations, so Vershbow’s remarks could be construed as a slight change in U.S. strategy toward forging a free trade deal with South Korea.

In spite of United Nations sanctions on the North following its nuclear weapon test in October, South Korea has kept two major cross-border joint projects afloat: an industrial complex in Kaesong just north of the border, and a tourism program at the North’s scenic Mount Geumgang.

In the industrial complex, South Korean businesses use cheap North Korean labor to produce goods. Twenty-one South Korean factories employ about 11,160 North Korean workers in Kaesong.

The six-party talks aimed at ending North Korea’s nuclear weapons program, involving the two Koreas, the U.S., China, Japan and Russia, will reconvene in Beijing on Thursday.

US May Accept Kaesong Goods
Korea Times
Ryu Jin
2/5/2007

The United States might recognize goods made at a joint industrial complex in the North Korean border city of Kaesong as South Korean products in a proposed free trade agreement (FTA) if there is a change in circumstances, the top U.S. diplomat in Seoul said Monday.

U.S. Ambassador to Seoul Alexander Vershbow said in a meeting with Unification Minister Lee Jae-joung that, although it seems unrealistic at the moment to recognize the Kaesong products as South Korean, there is room left to negotiate within the proposed FTA.

“Lee stressed that U.S. recognition of the goods produced in Kaesong as South Korean will contribute to bringing about a lasting peace on the Korean Peninsula,” a ministry official said after the meeting. “Ambassador Vershbow said `if,’ but he did not elaborate on what kind of change under what kind of circumstances.”

Vershbow’s remarks could be interpreted as a sign of change in U.S. strategy since Washington has so far refused to deal with the issue as an official agenda item in the ongoing negotiations for a South Korea-U.S. FTA.

Inter-Korean ties have soured in recent years in tandem with the deteriorating North Korea nuclear standoff. But the six-party talks aimed at ending North Korea’s nuclear program is expected to see a substantial progress in the coming round of negotiations.

South Korea has kept afloat its major cross-border projects with North Korea, including the joint industrial park in Kaesong and a tourism program at the North’s scenic Mt. Kumgang, even after Pyongyang’s nuclear test in October.

South Korea has exerted much effort to have its counterparts in FTAs, such as Southeast Asian countries, recognize the Kaesong products as “made in Korea” because it has a significance to further promote the joint industrial project.

A total of 21 South Korean factories are operating in the Kaesong industrial park at present, employing over 10,000 North Korean workers.

Posted in Economic reform, Foreign direct investment, International trade, Kaesong Industrial Complex (KIC), Special Economic Zones (Established before 2013), USA | Comments Closed

Hyundai Asan to boost North Korea tourism

Sunday, February 4th, 2007

Korea Herald
Kim Yoon-mi
2/5/2007

Eight years have passed since the late Chung Ju-yung, the former chairman of Hyundai Group, initiated the first inter-Korean tourism business with Hyundai Asan Corp., which operates tours to North Korea’s Mount Geumgang resort.

Since Hyundai Asan’s tour businesses have been held back by the North’s mixed messages and frequent changes in Seoul’s policy toward Pyongyang, they plan to attract 400,000 South Korean tourists and fast-track the official launch of tour of the North Korean city of Gaeseong, Hyundai officials said yesterday.

Hyundai Asan president and CEO Yoon Man-joon on Saturday paid a tribute to the family graveyard of the late Chung Ju-yung and Chung Mong-hun with Hyundai Asan executives. Yoon asked them to put forward their best efforts to meet the 2007 business target, Yonhap News reported.

“Although we had some difficulties last year, I’m doing my best to do better. We will see a good result this year if every one gets proactive,” Yonhap News quoted Yoon as saying.

Hyundai Asan’s tourism plan in Gaeseong was dampened when North Korea requested to sign a deal with another Korean company Lotte Tours Co. in August 2005, despite the earlier contract with Hyundai Asan.

In January this year, North Korea seemed turning to the original contract with Hyundai Asan when Seoul’s Unification Minister Lee Jae-young and Hyundai Group chairwoman Hyun Jeong-eun visited an industrial complex in Gaeseong on Jan. 24.

However, Pyongyang media once again denied South Korea’s local reports that the North will promote Gaeseong tourism with Hyundai Asan.

The biggest blow to Hyundai Asan last year was North Korea’s nuclear test on Oct. 9. With the tension created on the Korean peninsular after North’s nuclear test, the number of Mount Geumgang tourists plummeted, causing the failure of Hyundai Asan to meet the initial target of 400,000 vivitors. The number reached only 240,000 last year.

Hyundai Asan’s posted sales of 235 billion won ($249 million) and an operating profit of 2 billion won last year, which is a disappointing performance according to experts.

This year, Hyundai Asan said it will beef up its profitability by launching a new tour package to inner Geumgang, a golf course at the mountain resort, and offering a Gaeseong tour.

According to the company, it will open a new tour of inner Geumgang in April, have a test round at the golf course in June and open it in late October, aiming to attract more tourists.

For the Gaeseong industrial complex, Hyundai Asan said it will complete laying the ground work on the 3.3 million square meters of land by June and start working-level meetings on the second-phase development of the area with North Korean officials later on.

“The urgent issue for our company this year is to establish a solid profit structure so that it won’t be shaken by North Korean issues,” Yonhap quoted an official at Hyunda Asan as saying.

Posted in Foreign direct investment, Kaesong Industrial Complex (KIC), Mt. Kumgang Tourist Special Zone, Special Economic Zones (Established before 2013), Tourism | Comments Closed

China makes little investment in N. Korea since October nuclear test

Friday, February 2nd, 2007

Yonhap
2/2/2007

China has made little investment in North Korea since the North conducted its first nuclear device test in October last year, but their two-way trade volume rose 21.6 percent year-on-year over the past few months, informed sources said Friday.

“Over the three months since the October test, China made no investment in the North except in some low-budget mining development. But North Korea’s dependence on China in terms of trade increased sharply,” a senior government official said, asking to remain anonymous because of the sensitivity of the information.

Another source said from October to November in 2006, the trade volume between North Korea and Japan declined 75 percent year-on-year to US$7.9 million, illustrating the full range of the impact from United Nations sanctions over the North’s surprise nuclear test, they said.

Japan has shown the strongest response to the North’s nuclear test and long-range missile launches last year, banning North Korean goods and citizens from entering the country as well as barring its ships from Japanese ports.

In all of 2006, the trade volume between North Korea and China rose 7.5 percent year-on-year to $1.69 billion, while two-way trade between North Korea and Japan decreased 34 percent to $119 million in the first 11 months of last year, the source said.

“North Korea can make financial dealings only via Russia and a few other countries because it has a lot of trouble in doing financial transactions and wooing investments since the United States imposed financial sanctions on the North in September 2005,” he said.

The U.S. cut off Macau-based Banco Delta Asia’s access to the U.S. financial system, alleging that North Korea used the bank to counterfeit U.S. dollars and engage in other financial wrongdoing.

North Korea boycotted the six-party talks on its nuclear disarmament until December, saying that the U.S. should discuss ways to lift the sanctions on the sidelines of the six-nation talks involving the two Koreas, the U.S. China, Japan and Russia.

Posted in China, Economic reform, Foreign direct investment, International trade, Japan, Statistics, Trade Statistics | Comments Closed

Can Economic Theory Demystify North Korea?

Wednesday, January 31st, 2007

Japan Focus (Hat Tip Gregor)
Ruediger Frank
1/31/2007

Abstract
The starting point of this paper is the assumption that North Korea is de facto a well-defined nation-state, home to a national economy and inhabited by individuals that bear the same basic economic and social characteristics as individuals elsewhere. Despite the obvious specifics of the economic system and institutional structure of the country, standard economic theory should be applicable to the question of North Korean economic development. The article seeks to prove this as broadly as possible, showing that economic theory as diverse as classical and neoclassical, Marxist, Keynesian, institutional, developmentalist, neo-liberal or structuralist, dependency analysis-based and many others, including regionally centered approaches, can be utilized to explain the North Korean case with useful results, although the latter will inevitably vary depending on the chosen framework. Without arguing against or in favor of any of the available theoretical methods, this article advocates further research on North Korea as another case of development in East Asia, rather than as a mystical exception to the rule. This is particularly important in light of the tendency to describe North Korea as unpredictable, bizarre, and incomprehensible. This is clearly not the case.

Full paper below the fold

(more…)

Posted in 2002 Economic reforms, DPRK Policies, Economic reform, Foreign direct investment, International Aid, Political economy | Comments Closed

Analysis of North Korea’s ‘Market Economy’ 2

Friday, January 26th, 2007

Daily NK
Kim Min Se
1/26/2007

The “first-runners” are first-tier wholesalers who connect Chinese manufacturers and North Korean market owners in large cities such as Sinuiju, Hyesan, Hamheung or Chongjin. The goods transported by the first-runners to metropolitan markets in NK are met by second-runners in smaller cities.

South Pyongan province’s Pyongsong, Sunchon and Nampo are the hub for those second-runners, who move imported commodities to further deep into countryside of North and South Pyongan provinces and Hwanghae province.

Moon, a 38-year old shopkeeper in a market in Sunchon, South Pyongan, said “As soon as we hear the news that first-runners brought goods, we go to them with money right away. Since they run a huge amount of money, ordinary buyers can’t even meet them.”

Moon said that for second-runners including herself it took about half million NK wons (180 US dollars) to buy goods for one time. She buys merchandise from first-runners and sells it back to local storeowners.

For second-runners, it is crucial to procure enough high-quality goods with low price. If one buys bad products, he or she loses money. Same rule applies to first-runners.

Second-runners also hand over raw materials to manufacturers. The diminutive North Korean industry relies partly on them.

Chinese sugar and flour turn to bread and candy, and imported clothing materials are manufactured in home factories. Most of the manufacturers who buy raw materials from second-runners are individual handicraftsmen.

Lee, a clothing producer in Hamheung, sells her homemade clothes in market. Lee has had good relationship a number of second-runners, who trade Chinese fabric, so she can even buy stuff on credit.

Throughout the March of Tribulation in late 90s, North Korean people had depended on home industry for their basic necessities. And now it is estimated that significant amount of industrial products in North Korean markets are home-produced.

Those with little capital or without a stand in local market go to the most remote regions in high mountains or countryside and sell their handicrafts via train. Although it is not North Korean business slang, such activity can be classified as “third-running.”

The so-called “third-runners” trade their home-manufactured goods with country people’s corn, bean or rice, since it is rare to own a lot of cash in rural area.

In sum, once persecuted North Korean private markets are now reflecting every aspect of capitalist economy.

Posted in 1990s Famine, Agriculture, Banking, Black markets, Economic reform, Finance, Foreign direct investment, General markets (FMR: Farmers Market), Price liberalization, Private property | Comments Closed

3 Million NK Refugees Expected in Crisis: BOK

Friday, January 26th, 2007

Korea Times
Na Jeong-ju
1/26/2007

If at least one member of a North Korean household moves to South Korea after reunification, more than 3 million from the North may head south if the two Koreas are reunited, the Bank of Korea (BOK) said Friday.

According to the BOK’s Institute of Finance and Economy, if such an exodus takes place in North Korea after reunification, the South may face serious economic consequences, the report said.

If Koreas adopt a German model, in which West Germany extended financial support to East Germany before and after reunification, South Korea would shoulder a total of $500-$900 billion in reunification costs. If the money is spent appropriately, it will take 22-39 years for North Korea to top $10,000 in gross national income, the report said.

The institute proposed South and North Korea try to reduce economic gap through economic cooperation programs. If the South supports the North through development programs, using its capital and the North’s cheap labor, it can reduce reunification costs considerably, it said.

“It is desirable for the two Koreas to designate special economic zones to reduce their economic gap and conduct programs to develop the North Korean economy,’’ the report said.

With the development programs, the South can spend much less than adopting the German model, the report said. The reunification costs will be cut to $300-500 billion, while the period for North Korea to see a GNI of $10,000 will be shortened to 13-22 years, it added.

Posted in Bank of Korea, Economic reform, Foreign direct investment, South Korea, Special Economic Zones (Established before 2013) | Comments Closed

North Korean Economy Watch