Archive for February, 2007

Key Points of Nuke Accord

Tuesday, February 13th, 2007

Korea Times
2/13/2007

1. Within 60 days, the North must shut down and seal its main nuclear facilities at Yongbyon, north of the capital Pyongyang. International inspectors should be allowed to verify the process. For the initial steps, North Korea will get energy, food and other aid worth 50,000 tons of heavy fuel oil.

2. The United States will begin bilateral talks with North Korea to normalize their relations and will begin the processes of removing North Korea from its designation as a terror-sponsoring state and also ending U.S. trade sanctions. No deadline was set.

3. Japan will begin bilateral talks with North Korea to normalize their relations.

4. After 60 days, foreign ministers of all the countries will meet to confirm the implementation of the agreement and talk about security cooperation in northeast Asia. Some countries will hold a separate forum on negotiations for a permanent peace settlement to replace the 1953 cease-fire that ended the Korean War.

5. The North must provide a complete list of its nuclear programs and disable all existing nuclear facilities. In return, the North will get aid in corresponding steps worth 950,000 tons of heavy fuel oil _ details of which will be addressed in later working group discussions.

6. Five working groups will be created: denuclearization, U.S.-North Korea relations, Japan-North Korea relations, economic cooperation and on a peace and security mechanism in northeast Asia.

7. The six-nation talks will meet again March 19.

Share

Chronology of major events surrounding N. Korean nuclear standoff

Tuesday, February 13th, 2007

Yonhap
2/13/2007

The following is a chronology of major events surrounding the dispute over North Korea’s nuclear weapons program and six-party talks aimed at ending the crisis.

List below the fold:
(more…)

Share

U.S. to remove financial sanctions on N. Korea in 30 days: Hill

Tuesday, February 13th, 2007

Yonhap
2/13/2007

The top U.S. negotiator in international talks aimed at ending North Korea’s nuclear weapons program said Tuesday his country will remove its financial sanctions on the communist nation within a month.

The measure follows Pyongyang’s agreement to “disable” its nuclear-related facilities and programs in return for economic and diplomatic benefits.

“We will resolve the matter of the financial sanctions” within 30 days, Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill told reporters as he returned from a six-party talks meeting, at which North Korea agreed to shut down its Yongbyon nuclear complex in two months.

His remarks partly confirmed an earlier report by a pro-Pyongyang newspaper that the U.S. nuclear envoy had last month promised his North Korean counterpart, Kim Kye-gwan, to remove the financial restrictions within 30 days after progress in the nuclear negotiations.

The two held three days of meetings in Berlin, which were followed by two-day talks between the countries’ financial officials in Beijing later that month.

North Korea had stayed away from the nuclear talks for over a year after the U.S. imposed sanctions on a Macau bank with suspected links to the North’s illicit financial activities in September 2005.

The six-party talks resumed late last year after a 13-month hiatus, but they again failed to produce a breakthrough as North Korea refused to discuss the nuclear issue, and instead stuck to its demand for the U.S. to remove the financial sanctions.

Tuesday’s agreement marked a milestone in negotiations that had made little progress since they began in 2003.

North Korea is to shut down the Yongbyon complex, which includes a nuclear reprocessing facility, within 60 days, and receive “emergency energy assistance equivalent to 50,000 tons of heavy fuel oil,” the statement said.

The nuclear talks are also attended by South Korea, the U.S., Japan, Russia and host China.

Share

Kim Jong-il Wins Kim il Sung Peace Prize (update)

Monday, February 12th, 2007

 The wise decision has been re-celebrated in the DPRK:

 Int’l Kim Il Sung Prize Council’s Decision Hailed
   Pyongyang, February 12 (KCNA) — Meetings were held in South Africa and Mongolia on Feb. 5 and 6 in support of the decision of the International Kim Il Sung Prize Council on awarding the “International Kim Il Sung Prize” to Kim Jong Il. 

  A branch chairman of the Pretoria City Committee of the African National Congress of South Africa said in a speech at the meeting that the decision reflected the unanimous desire of the world progressives highly praising the exploits of Kim Jong Il who is leading socialism and the human cause of independence to victory with his distinguished political ability and outstanding leadership ability. 

    The secretary general of the Centre for the Study of the Juche Idea of Mongolian Chinggis Khan College said at the meeting that Kim Jong Il is wisely leading the building of a great prosperous powerful nation and the cause of Korea’s reunification with his Songun politics. 

The decision was also hailed by Bonakele Majuba, secretary of the Mfumalanga Provincial Committee of the South African Communist Party and chairman of the South African Association for Friendship and Solidarity with the Korean People, and Youssef Amin Wali, vice-chairman of the National Democratic Party of Egypt, in their statements on Feb. 5. The Egypt-Korea Friendship Association expressed its support in a statement on Feb. 6 celebrating the February holiday.

Original Post: (Hat Tip Letters From China)

New Delhi, February 2, 2007 (KCNA) –The International Kim Il Sung Prize Council announced in New Delhi on February 1 its decision on awarding the “International Kim Il Sung Prize” to Kim Jong Il on the occasion of his birthday. According to it, the council decided to confer the prize on General Secretary Kim Jong Il on the occasion of his birthday in high recognition of his immortal contribution to the noble cause for global peace and security and the independent development of humankind.

Share

Seoul Wants 6 Nations to Shoulder Burden for Energy Aid to NK

Sunday, February 11th, 2007

Korea Times
Park Song-wu
2/11/2007

South Korea is thinking of chairing a working group for energy aid to North Korea as the United States is trying to differentiate this round of the six-party talks from a 1994 process, a Seoul official said on Sunday.

But Seoul has a firm position that all parties should jointly pay the “tax” for peace, he said.

“Denuclearization will benefit all parties, so the burdens should be shared jointly,” he said. “But we are thinking of taking the lead in the working group for energy aid, considering the circumstances of the other parties.”

He did not elaborate. But Tokyo is not expected to raise its hand to chair the working group, considering the Japanese anger over the North’s abduction of its nationals in the past.

Russia prefers forgiving the North’s debts instead of providing it with energy.

China, host of the multilateral dialogue, is already playing the most important role of chairing the six-party meeting.

What the United States apparently has in mind, and consented to by all parties, is the necessity to differentiate the result of these on-going negotiations from the 1994 Agreed Framework.

Since it was signed by Robert Gallucci and Kang Sok-ju in Geneva on October 21, 1994, Washington provided 500,000 tons of heavy oil annually to Pyongyang over the following seven years.

But the North’s promise to freeze its graphite-moderated reactors in return for two light-water reactors was not obeyed, causing the Bush administration to criticize the deal as a diplomatic failure of his predecessor, Bill Clinton. After that, U.S. diplomats even avoided meeting their North Korean counterparts bilaterally.

The U.S. policy, however, has recently reached a turning point.

“The Bush administration may have been driven to greater negotiating flexibility by a need to achieve a foreign policy victory to compensate for declining public support for the Iraq war and the loss of the Republican leadership of Congress,” Bruce Klingner, a senior research fellow for the Heritage Foundation said in a recent article.

But one thing that has not changed is the U.S. hope of not repeating the “mistake” it made with the Geneva agreement.

From 1994 to 2002, Pyongyang received 3.56 million tons of heavy oil, equivalent to $500 million, from the now-defunct Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO), and the United States shouldered the largest share of $347 million.

To shake off that bad memory, Washington wants to use the term “shut down” instead of “freezing” and even wants to avoid providing fuel oil to the North, reportedly citing the possibility that it can be used for military purposes.

So the talks have dragged on. And, to make things worse, the North Koreans are demanding a lot.

Japan’s Kyodo news agency reported that North Korea had demanded 2 million tons of heavy oil or 2 million kilowatts of electricity in exchange for taking the initial steps towards denuclearization.

Christopher Hill, the top U.S. envoy, expressed hope on Sunday that such technical issues could be discussed at working group meetings. On the same day, the Seoul official hinted that South Korea will chair the working group.

Share

Land Leasing Law

Sunday, February 11th, 2007

From Naenara:

The DPRK Law on the Leasing of Land was adopted by Resolution No. 40 of the Standing Committee of the Supreme People’s Assembly on October 27, 1993, and amended by Decree No. 484 of the Presidium of the Supreme People’s Assembly on February 26, 1999.

The law consists of 42 articles in 6 chapters.

Chapter 1. Fundamentals (Articles 1~8)

This chapter stipulates that the mission of the law is to contribute to establishing a proper system in the leasing of land needed for foreign investors and foreign-invested enterprises and for use of the leased land.

A foreign corporate body or individual may lease and use land in the DPR Korea and the lessee has the right to use the land leased. When land is leased, natural resources and deposits in the land leased are not covered by the right to use land. The term of lease is fixed by agreement between the contracting parties within the limit of 50 years.

Chapter 2. Ways of leasing land (Articles 9~14)

This chapter defines the ways of leasing land.

It stipulates that the leasing of land should be undertaken through consultation or by means of tender or auction. It also notes that the lessor should provide the lessee with the data like the location and area of the land and its topographical map, uses to which the land may be put, the building area, a plan for development of the land, the period during which construction must be completed and the minimum amount of investment required, the requirements for environmental protection, hygiene and anti-epidemics and fire prevention, the term of lease of the land and the state of development of the land.

The lessee must use land in accordance with the contract for use of land. A lessee who wishes to alter the use of land must conclude a supplementary contract with the lessor.

Chapter. 3 Transfer and mortgage of the right to use land (Articles 15-27)

This chapter stipulates that the lessee is permitted, with the approval of the lessor; to transfer (by means of selling, re-leasing, donation or inheritance) or mortgage to a third party the right to use a part or the whole of the land leased and defines in detail the problems arising in the transfer and mortgage of the right to use land.

It also prescribes the condition for transferring the right to use land, the limits of its transfer and the procedure for the sale of the right to use land.

The lessee is allowed to sell, re-lease, donate or mortgage the leased land only after paying the total amount of charge for transferring the right to use land stipulated in the contract for leasing the land and making the contracted investment. In case of the transfer of the right to use land, the rights and obligations relating to the use of the land, and the structures and other appurtenance on it, are also transferred.

When a lessee sells the right to use land, the lessor has the preferential right to buy it.

The chapter also notes that the lessee may re-lease the land leased observing due formalities and defines the procedures for mortgaging the right to use land.

A lessee may mortgage the right to use land with the purpose of obtaining a loan from a bank or other financial institutions. In this case the mortgagor and the mortgagee must conclude a contract for the mortgage in accordance with the terms of the contract for leasing the land. The two contracting parties must register the mortgaged right with the relevant lessor within 10 days.

If the right to use land is mortgaged, the structures and other appurtenance on the land are also mortgaged with the land. When concluding a contract for the mortgage, the mortgagee may request the mortgagor the contract for leasing the land, a copy of the transfer contract, a copy of the certificate for use of the land or other information relating to the current state of the land.

The chapter defines the right of mortgagee when the right to use land is mortgaged as well.

The mortgagee may dispose of the right to use the land mortgaged by contract, as well as the structures and other appurtenance of the land in accordance with the mortgage contract if the mortgagor fails to pay the amount due by the expiry of the mortgage, or if business has been dissolved or gone bankrupt during the period of the mortgage contract. One who has won the right to use land and the structures and other appurtenance on it disposed of by the mortgagee must receive attestation from a notary office, register the change with the registration office and use the land in accordance with the contract for leasing the land.

The mortgagor is not permitted to remortgage or transfer the right to use land during the period of contract without the approval of the mortgagee.

Chapter 4. Rent of land (Articles 28-33)

This chapter notes that the lessee must pay rent for the leased land to the lessor. When leasing developed land, the lessor will receive from the lessee the charge for transferring the right to use land plus the cost of land development. The lessee must pay the total amount of charge for transferring the right to use land within 90 days of signing the contract for leasing land. If the charge is not paid before the prescribed deadline, the lessor must demand additional payment equivalent to 0.1% of the overdue rent on a daily basis, starting from the first day of default.

A lessee who has been leased land through consultation or auction must pay to the lessor a guaranty equivalent to 10% of the charge for transferring the right to use land, within 15 days of the conclusion of the contract for leasing the land. The user of the land leased should pay annually land use charge. In this case, for those who invest in priority sectors and in the Rason economic and trade zone, land use charges may be reduced or exempted for up to 10 years.

Chapter 5. Return of the right to use land (Articles 34~38)

This chapter provides that the right to use land automatically returns to the lessor on the expiry of the term of the lease stipulated in the contract. The structures and other appurtenance on the land also return, without compensation being paid.

The chapter defines the procedure for canceling the registration of the right to use land, extension of the term of land lease, the expense for the withdrawal and clearance of the leased land and the cancellation of the right to use the leased land.

Chapter 6. Penalties and settlement of disputes (Articles 39-42)

This chapter specifies that if a lessee illegally uses land without the certificate for the use of land, or changes the use of land or transfers or mortgages the right to use land without approval, he must be fined, have the facilities on the land confiscated or be required to restore the land to its original state, and the contract for transfer or mortgage be declared null and void.

The chapter also stipulates the ways of depriving the lessee of the right to use land, appealing to or filing a suit on it and settling the disputes.

In case of a failure to invest 50% of the total sum of investment during the period prescribed in the contract for the leasing of land, or to develop the land as contracted, the lessee may be deprived of the right to use land.

If the lessee disagrees with the penalty imposed on him, he may appeal to an institution senior to the one that has imposed sanctions or file a suit with an appropriate court within 20 days of the receipt of the notice of penalty.

Disagreements arising in leasing land or transferring and mortgaging leased land to a third party must be settled through consultation.

In case of failure in consultation, they must be settled through arbitration or legal procedures provided by the DPRK, or may be taken to an arbitration body in a third country for settlement.

The DPRK Law on the Leasing of Land contributes to establishing a proper system and order in the leasing of land needed for foreign investors and foreign-invested enterprises in order to secure their investment and activities.

Share

Swiss banking association denies any dealings with Kim Jong-il

Saturday, February 10th, 2007

Yonhap
2/10/2007

An official of Switzerland’s banking industry denied accusations that the country’s banks are involved in dealings with North Korea’s leader Kim Jong-il, saying such involvement would taint the industry’s image, a report said.

“There is no way a Swiss bank would be running a bank account for Kim Jong-il knowing that he is a dictator. The reputational risk is simply too high,” James Nason, a spokesman for the Swiss Bankers’ Association, told Washington-based Radio Free Asia (RFA) on Friday.

Share

Settling in

Saturday, February 10th, 2007

Korea Herald
2/10/2007

What was once a trickle of defectors from North Korea has now become a steady stream, forcing the South Korean government to reexamine how it handles settlers from its communist neighbor.

Gone are the days when defectors were given a hero’s welcome, used as propaganda to demonstrate the failure of the totalitarian communist system, and given large sums of money as a reward. These days, news of individual defectors hardly receives any attention, and without much fanfare their numbers have been growing rapidly. The number of defectors who arrived in the South totaled 148 in 1999. Last year, more than 2,000 North Koreans settled in the South. By the end of this month, the total number of North Korean settlers here is expected to reach 10,000.

To deal with the prospect of a surge in the number North Korean defectors in the future, as food shortages and poverty continues to ravage that country, the South Korean government has revamped its settlement policy. By cutting its one-time settlement aid from 10 million won to 6 million won and increasing job subsidies to a total of 15 million won spread over a three-year period, the government is hoping to encourage the settlers to seek gainful employment rather than relying on government support.

For the new settlers, life in the capitalist South is harsh. Many of those who risked their lives to escape hunger and poverty, live in a state of poverty even in the South. Three months of training at a settlement center is insufficient to equip these people for our highly competitive capitalist society.

Some settlers are cheated out of their settlement awards and end up alcoholic and destitute. Most of the settlers are semi-skilled laborers, making it difficult for them to find permanent jobs. Difficulties in finding employment are exacerbated by prejudices harbored by South Koreans who perceive North Koreans as lazy and unmotivated.

According to a report by the Database Center for North Korean Human Rights which surveyed 1,336 settlers over the age of 13 who arrived between 1997 and 2004, more than 28 percent of the settlers are unemployed, significantly higher than the national average of 3.5 percent as of the end of last year. Of those who are employed, about 78 percent earn 1 million won or less a month.

To assist the North Korean settlers in seeking employment, the Unification Ministry and the Labor Ministry plans to jointly set up an individual job plan system. Employment subsidies, paid to businesses that hire North Koreans to cover 50 percent of their wage, will be extended to three years from the current two years.

However, government policies can only go so far in assisting North Korean settlers to make a life in the South. In a society that harbors regional prejudices even within its own borders, the discrimination suffered by North Koreans who speak with a different accent and who may still be regarded as an enemy must be enormous.

As much as the settlers need training to adjust to a new way of life here, South Koreans also need to receive sensitivity training on how to deal with the North Korean settlers. Understanding each other will go a long way toward helping the settlers become full, productive members of this society.

Government to raise subsidies for defectors here
Joong ang Daily
2/9/2007

South Korea will nearly double the amount of cash incentives that North Korean defectors receive after working here for one year, the Unification Ministry said yesterday.

Under the plan, the government will grant a total of 15 million won ($16,040) to defectors over a three-year period after they are registered on an employer’s payroll for one year. Previously, defectors received 9 million won over three years.

“The incentive is designed to increase support for North Korean defectors who are trying hard to adapt to South Korean society,” said Kim Joong-tae, chief of the social and cultural exchange bureau at the ministry.

Since 2005, Korea has reduced its cash payment to defectors to 10 million won from 28 million won per one-person household.

Under the new plan, which considers the rise in rental fees, the housing subsidy will be increased to 13 million won per one-person household from the current 10 million won, while the cash subsidy will be further cut to 6 million won, he said.

The total number of North Korean defectors to the South since the end of the 1950-53 Korean War will likely top the 10,000 mark sometime this year, according to government data.

When heavy floods hit North Korea in the mid-1990s, the annual number of North Korean defectors reached double digits. In 1999, the number swelled to a triple-digit level. In 2006, as many as 1,578 defectors arrived in the South, a rise from the previous record of 1,139 in 2002, according to the data.

About 9,700 North Koreans have been resettled in the South after finishing procedures and obtaining government identification, while some 300 are now receiving adaptive education at a state-run institute. More than 500 defectors are currently believed to be in the custody of South Korean embassies or consulates in Thailand, Mongolia and other countries.

In 2000, the leaders of the two Koreas held the first-ever summit since the end of the Korean War. The war ended in an armistice, not a peace treaty, meaning the two Koreas are still technically in a state of war.

Share

DPRK population: $23 million- economy: $20.8 billion

Friday, February 9th, 2007

Companies Must Grow in Size
Joong Ang Daily
Song Byung-nak
2/9/2007

Ethiopia has a population of 70 million and its economy is valued at $7.7 billion, while North Korea has a populace of 23 million and an economy worth $20.8 billion. Meanwhile, Samsung Electronics has 70,000 workers, and its sales amount to $72 billion, with value added assessed at $21.6 billion, according to a 2004 issue of Fortune magazine. Value added produced by Samsung Electronics is larger than that of North Korea’s economy and three times larger than that of Ethiopia.

Ethiopia used to be better off and assisted us during the Korean War. But now it has become the second-poorest nation in the world. Due to socialist policies that impede corporate activities, Ethiopia has no large companies with an international presence and few medium- or small-sized companies. Its per-capita income is only $110.

Let’s take a look at the United States, the world’s richest country. Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, has accumulated assets worth $50 billion. The assets of General Electric are larger than those of the 227 affiliates of Korea’s top 10 companies combined. The sales value of the world’s largest company, Exxon Mobile Corporation, is $380 billion and its net profit is $39 billion. Washington prioritizes the protection of national interests when devising its foreign policies. At the core are measures to protect and boost its companies.

Advanced countries have many companies that represent them. Among Fortune’s list of 500 global corporations, there are 170 U.S. companies and 70 Japanese. France and Britain combined have 38 companies on the list. Twelve Korean companies appear, the same number as Switzerland, even though the European country has only one- sixth of our population.

As there are many global companies in the United States, people can choose between many alternatives when they look for a job. As wages are good, Americans have stable finances. As there is a system to make money through stocks, people do not spend excessive energy and time on trying to find ways to make more money, the kind of thing that creates instability in Korea.

According to the World Bank’s annual World Development Report, Korea’s economy is the world’s ninth-largest among advanced countries, but it ranks 11th if China and India are included. The International Monetary Fund also included Korea in its list of the 28 most advanced countries.

However, Korea has too few large-scale companies to compete effectively on the global stage. In order to become a truly competitive country, Korea needs to develop and foster its companies.

There is another reason the country needs to develop big companies: a shortage of jobs. Every year, 630,000 people with degrees come on to the labor market. But the number of available jobs is only half of the number of job-seekers.

The government plans to create jobs to fill this gap, but it is not the right body to create jobs. The number of government civil servants is now 1 million.

Even if the number doubles, that cannot resolve the problem of long-term unemployment. As civil servants are paid with taxpayers’ money, to increase their numbers means an increase in taxes and bureaucracy. That is something that we should avoid.

We need to nurture companies to increase our penetration of global markets and we need to make partnership companies become listed enterprises in order to create more jobs. There are three things to do.

First, we need to grant prizes and honor to world-class companies and entrepreneurs, just as we grant medals and lifetime bonuses to athletes who become world champions.

These days, young people flock to become government officials, members of the judiciary or lawyers. Instead, we should encourage them to become world-class entrepreneurs if we want to win any battles in the economic war.

Second, most of Korea’s global companies have been founded and developed by conglomerates.

Peter Drucker advised that Korea should develop its current conglomerates into global ones, instead of dismantling them.

These days, there is no such thing as one correct way to run a company or an organization. We should help a company that is not part of a large conglomerate to become big enough to represent the country.

Third, in preparation for a free trade agreement with Washington, we should develop a more competitive corporate environment that is like the one in the United States. We must lift regulations on all forms of investment. The government, companies and the people should do their best to develop companies that can represent the country on the international stage.

Share

Foreign Rating Agency Executives Visit Kaesong

Friday, February 9th, 2007

Korea Times
Lee Jin-woo
2/9/2007
 
A group of 17 people including high-level executives from Moody’s Investors Service and Goldman Sachs made a half-day visit to the joint industrial complex in the North Korean border city of Kaesong on Friday, the Ministry of Unification said.

Three executives from each company were accompanied by officials from the Ministry of Finance and Economy as well as the Ministry of Unification.

The short trip was part of the foreign rating agencies’ annual meeting on South Korea’s sovereign rating.

During the visit, they received a briefing from officials of the Kaesong Industiral District Management Committee, which manages the site’s development process, and looked around the first completed district of the industrial complex.

The government has had to hold off its plan to sell the first batch of some 1 million pyong (3.3 million square meters) of land to South Korean companies that wished to move into the industrial complex.

The plan was initially scheduled in June last year, but was suspended indefinitely due to signs of a North Korean missile test. Pyongyang pushed ahead with its plan and test-fired seven ballistic missiles on July 5, which was then followed by its first-ever nuclear test on Oct. 9.

Moody’s upgraded South Korea’s rating to A3 in March 2002, its seventh-highest investment grade.

Officials, however, were cautious about the chances for a higher sovereign rating.

“It remains to be seen whether Moody’s will upgrade South Korea’s credit rating, but it’s true that they react quite sensitively to geopolitical issues related to North Korea,” said a ranking official of the finance ministry.

Another official expected a positive effect from the visit, saying “The outcome of the ongoing six-party talks in Beijing is most important without a doubt, but this trip will help officials of the foreign rating agencies have a better understanding of our efforts and faith in inter-Korean business projects.”

The number of North Koreans working for the 18 South Korean firms at the industrial complex surpassed 10,000 late last year.

By 2012, the complex is expected to house about 2,000 South Korean manufacturers employing about half a million North Koreans, according to the Ministry of Unification.

Share