<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glyn Ford&#8217;s nuclear solution&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://www.nkeconwatch.com/2008/03/27/glyn-fords-nuclear-solution/</link>
	<description>News and analysis of the North Korean economy</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: North Korean Economy Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Uranium enrichment verification in the DPRK</title>
		<link>http://www.nkeconwatch.com/2008/03/27/glyn-fords-nuclear-solution/#comment-62172</link>
		<dc:creator>North Korean Economy Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Uranium enrichment verification in the DPRK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nkeconwatch.com/2008/03/27/glyn-fords-nuclear-solution/#comment-62172</guid>
		<description>[...] can any uranium enrichment verification plan be implemented in the DPRK?  One solution was proposed to me by Glyn Ford, a member of the European Parliament, when I met him in Beijing last March.  His idea was this: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] can any uranium enrichment verification plan be implemented in the DPRK?  One solution was proposed to me by Glyn Ford, a member of the European Parliament, when I met him in Beijing last March.  His idea was this: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
